CCMIN030414 - Laserfiche WebLink

be abandoned at such a critical stage. He explained that Kiewit has actively sought to develop its property since 2003. They were first asked to wait for completion of the General Plan process, which was delayed until 2009, and then again asked to wait for the Housing Element update that followed in 2012. Despite the Kiewit site ranking third of all properties analyzed, the city indicated at the end of that process that it would be considered for rezoning as part of the Specific Plan process rather than the Housing Element update. He stressed that Kiewit has been patient and cooperative throughout this and now asks that the city not ask them to wait again by stopping this process. The studies being conducted under the draft Environmental Impact Report are critical to determining the constraints and costs of developing the plan area and ultimately determining the viability of the infrastructure and amenities proposed within the plan. He stressed that the preferred plan being studied is not a RHNA plan, noting that it represents a balanced mix of housing, retail, and park space. He said he looks forward to continuing to work with the city on outreach to help determine what is best for all stakeholders. Councilmember Brown noted that references to other plans not yet built out really refer to full build out. She asked staff to estimate what portion of a plan is generally accomplished within the first five years. Mr. Dolan said there is significant variation unique to each setting and he has seen some completed plan areas make no move towards development for many years whereas others average ten to fifteen years. Carol Cohen said she represents the collective opinion of the Ironwood community. She said the East Pleasanton Specific Plan ignores both the voter approved housing cap and urban growth boundary. Based on recent information provided to the city by the Department of Housing and Community Development's Executive Director, the city has both met its 2014-2022 obligations and has a surplus of over 1,200 units. The Specific Plan raises many issues for the community related to safety, overcrowding of roads and schools, and the environmental impacts of expanding housing. She said the Ironwood community does not support this process and believes that all efforts to develop housing on the east side should immediately cease, with no additional funds or effort to be expended by the city, staff or consultants. She asked that the Council focus its limited resources on more immediate incentives to enhance the quality of life in Pleasanton rather than pursue work that will most likely not be applicable to the next planning cycle. She cautioned against caving to pressure from land developers in an election year and urged the Council to serve its citizens rather than special interest groups. Kay Ayala stated that the spirit of the housing cap is still alive and well Pleasanton and in fact many community members do not yet understand the impacts of its being overturned. She noted that when approved at 29,000 units, staff predicted a population of 70,000. Pleasanton now has over 71,000 residents. She said the Specific Plan process is broken and if not stopped here and now, the community will likely force it to a halt somewhere down the line. She cautioned that the 1,500 units which are approved but not yet built will largely change the face of Pleasanton and urged the Council to address current infrastructure issues before initiating any additional impacts. Councilmember Brown confirmed that Ms. Ayala has spoken with Pleasanton Gravel Company and asked if they had indicated their feelings on the project. Ms. Ayala stated that Pleasanton Gravel does not support the project and indicated it intends to file suit against the city if it moves forward. She stressed that this is not a plan the community accepts and suggested the matter be put to the voters if the Council has any doubts. David Stark, Bay East Association of Realtors, said it was wonderful to learn the city has satisfied its current RHNA obligation. He said the East Pleasanton Specific Plan offers many benefits, particularly for homeowners like himself who live on the east side of town. He acknowledged concerns over the direction the plan has taken but said there is an opportunity here to create a vision that both developers and residents can support. He said that stopping the process now is simply kicking the can down the City Council Minutes Page 9 of 12 March 4,2014