My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
041514
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2015 3:28:19 PM
Creation date
4/8/2014 3:20:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Seto stated that this can be clarified in the report to the City Council. She added that <br /> there is more language in that section about defining what is a substantial renovation, so <br /> staff will make sure that language is excerpted so when people read it, it is all together as it <br /> appears separated right now. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br /> Mr. Paxson stated that he wanted to make sure one other thing gets into the thinking: there <br /> is a new State law, SB1339, that is in the process of getting rolled out, which requires <br /> employers that have more than 50 employees to provide transit benefits to their employees. <br /> He indicated that there may be some good opportunities to tee off some of the education <br /> work that is getting done as that program gets rolled out that employers are going to have <br /> to comply with, to partner with some of the new regulations that staff is talking about. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Ritter inquired if the regulation being proposed is similar to what Hacienda <br /> already has or if the City is adding to that. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that it is similar in many ways. She stated that Hacienda's program also <br /> covers the commercial as well the transit incentive, and it certainly is a good question why <br /> the commercial would not be included. She added that Mr. Paxson also brings up another <br /> good point that the Bay Area Commuter Benefits Program, which is the result of SB1339, <br /> will actually require employers of 50 or more full-time employees in the Bay Area to offer <br /> their employees one of four different benefits to encourage transit, one of which is to <br /> exclude their transit or vanpool cars from taxable income, provide a transit subsidy, provide <br /> free or low cost bus, and so on. She added that the program is a mandatory program and <br /> will have a big impact. She noted that the proposed amendment was not going into that as <br /> it covered it. <br /> Commissioner Pearce moved to recommend approval to the City Council of <br /> Case P14-0001, as shown in Exhibit A of the staff report, with the addition of <br /> language to include suggested amendments from James Paxson regarding <br /> equivalent incentives and location of parking. <br /> Commissioner Ritter seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, O'Connor, Olson, Pearce, and Ritter <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> RECUSED: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> Resolution No. PC-2014-11 recommending approval to the City Council of Case <br /> P14-0001was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 26, 2014 Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.