Laserfiche WebLink
�' / Aoarox.375' y Aoprox.407 1'-'so <br /> •1� \✓ 1 —_� • a� ...— LOT <br /> ' T� AIt.2 building envelope <br /> .1,4, /011111• o^ 4 . r �= A�i�n{.� AIt.1 building envelope <br /> r � ;-. - ,- 4 4LOT r 1 t,' <br /> ti. �---1 500 <br /> N.� :. 111,,, �� r i <br /> --- 1 I Alternative 2 <br /> i ! � -- —r y--- Site Layout <br /> —f• <br /> Comparison of Alternatives for Lot 2. The table below lists the amount of grading that would <br /> be needed for the proposed development on Lot 2 and distance between the proposed <br /> building envelope on Lot 2 to the rear property corner of Lots 7 and 9 of Silver Oaks Lane for <br /> 1 each site layout. It also compares the alternative site layouts to the proposed site layout on <br /> Lot 2. <br /> Lot 2 Proposal Alternative 1 Alternative 2 <br /> Pad Elevation Above 515 feet 510 feet 500 feet <br /> Sea Level for Lot 2 <br /> Grading (amount of 6,100 cubic yards 8,600 cubic yards 12,600 cubic yards <br /> soil to be off-hauled) (430± truckloads) (618± truckloads) (903±truckloads) <br /> Distance from the Lot 463±feet 375±feet 407±feet <br /> 2 envelope to the <br /> Rear Property Corner <br /> of Lots 7 and 9 on <br /> Silver Oaks Lane <br /> Comparison of the Alternative Site Layouts to the Proposed Site Layout <br /> Proposal Alternative 1 Alternative 2 <br /> Pad Elevation -- 5 feet lower 15 feet lower <br /> Grading -- 2,500 additional cu.yd. 6,500 additional cu.yd. <br /> Distance from the Lot -- 88 feet closer 56 feet closer <br /> 2 envelope to the rear <br /> property corner of <br /> Lots 7 and 9 on Silver <br /> Oaks Lane <br /> PUD-84 Planning Commission <br /> Page 12 of 23 <br />