My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22 ATTACHMENT 04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
041514
>
22 ATTACHMENT 04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2015 3:39:03 PM
Creation date
4/4/2014 1:13:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/15/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
22 ATTACHMENT 4
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Posson replied that he does not. He added that he thinks the more they <br /> can simulate what it would look like from Silver Oaks, the better it would be, especially <br /> in light of what the Commission heard from the residents tonight. <br /> Commissioner Allen indicated that she supports additional viewpoints as well. She <br /> suggested stakes for the proposed plan, especially if the upper house were brought <br /> down a little bit. She stated that it might help to have an additional two or three <br /> scenarios that people could really look at to see if one scenario is better than another. <br /> Commissioner Olson stated that he thought the pictures were good. He agreed that it <br /> probably would be helpful for the people in the area who have concerns to check a few <br /> other viewpoints on this. <br /> Chair Pearce agreed. She stated that she certainly liked what were given to the <br /> Commission, except for the conceptual one that had the violent green on it, which she <br /> assumes is still a draft. She indicated that she would support more viewpoints if there <br /> are specific things that neighbors are looking for and that it might be good for the <br /> applicant to check in with them to mollify concerns about the visuals. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he was fine with what was submitted, based on <br /> what the proposals were. He added that he would like to see a couple of options if the <br /> upper house were moved down, and given the concerns of the neighbors, it would be <br /> good to have one or two view shots from even their backyard to see what the exposure <br /> is going to be from those homes. <br /> 6. Are there any other concerns the Planning Commission has about this <br /> proposal? <br /> None of the Commissioners had any other concerns. <br /> Chair Pearce stated that the Commission has discussed the major points and thanked <br /> everyone. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 24, 2013 Page 10 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.