Laserfiche WebLink
The following table shows summaries the proposed plan and the alternatives: <br /> The Proposed Alternative No. 1 Alternative No. 2 Alternative No. 3 <br /> Plan <br /> No. of New Lots 2 3 2 2 <br /> Within the Lot 1 —yes Except for a small Lot 1 —yes Lot 1 —yes <br /> Hillside Lot 2 —a portion portion of Lots 1 Lot 2—a portion Lot 2— approx. <br /> Residential Area &2 - yes one half of the lot <br /> Road Location On the east side On the west side On the west side On the west side <br /> of the subject site of the subject site of the subject site of the subject site <br /> Slope of the 6-12% 6-12% 6-19% 6-12% <br /> Road <br /> Retaining Wall 4-9 feet 8-25 feet 2-6 feet None <br /> Height(s) <br /> Heritage-sized 0 8 6 12 <br /> Tree Removal <br /> Pad Elevations Lot 1: 460' Lot 1: 445' Lot 1: 462' 450' <br /> Lot 2: 515' Lot 2: 455' Lot 2: 492' <br /> Lot 3: 465' <br /> Approximate 83,470 sq.ft. 98, 843 sq.ft. 107,541 sq.ft. 107,037 sq.ft. <br /> Amount of <br /> Disturbed Area <br /> From the proposed alternatives, Alternative No. 1 may be revised slightly so that all three new <br /> residential lots would fit within the Hillside Residential area and responds to HOA's concern of <br /> compliance to the specific plan. However, this alternative would result in significant grading <br /> and retaining walls, and would remove eight heritage-sized oak trees. It may not address the <br /> disruptive visual impacts raised by the Silver Oaks Estates HOA in terms of retaining walls and <br /> intrusive privacy issue from the proposed three new homes to the existing homes on Silver <br /> Oaks Lane. <br /> Neither Alternative No. 2 nor Alternative No. 3 fits within the Hillside Residential area. The <br /> proposed road on Alternative No. 2 is very steep, exceeding the maximum slope which is <br /> acceptable to the Fire Department. Both alternatives would result in removal of several <br /> heritage-sized oak trees. <br /> Discussion Point No. 1: Does the Planning Commission support the applicants' proposal for <br /> siting the homes or is there a preference for Alternatives 1, 2 or 3? <br /> Road Alignment and Grading <br /> The Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan (VACSP) states the following that would apply to <br /> the proposed development: <br /> Geological Requirements Relating to Construction, (p. 51) <br /> Page - 13 <br />