CCMIN020414 - Laserfiche WebLink

larger than the community park, can accommodate a dog park. If however, the Council strongly supports the idea on the Oak Woodland Area it can direct staff to return with a more thoughtful analysis on how to accomplish that. Vice-Mayor Pentin asked and Mr. Fialho confirmed that the original site location is not treated similarly to Sites 5, 12 or 13 in this context. Mr. Fialho explained that these sites, while illustrated similarly, did not go before the voters. Only Bernal Community Park, which is specific to the 50 acres, and the Oak Woodland Area went to the voters. Vice-Mayor Pentin acknowledged that Phase 4 is not in the immediate future but said he would hate to lose the original location (Site 8), with its access to other amenities. He said that the ability to construct the slated uses on Site 12 and 13 are important and questioned the feasibility of Site 5. He asked whether staff is ready to present the Council with an option to take the matter to the voters, if that should be the Council's direction. Mr. Fialho confirmed. Councilmember Brown asked how elaborate staff anticipated the scope of such project to be. Mr. Bocian explained that the standards outlined in the Draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan calls for a one to two acre area While it would not be very expensive to develop, it does require some thought relative to layout, amenities and utilities. Councilmember Cook-Kallio said the community desire for a dog park is longstanding. She asked how the need is determined and whether such an amenity could minimize the strain on or misuse of the sports park, which would ultimately be a benefit to the community. Mr. Bocian explained that the need is determined using a variety of information including overall park amenity standards for a community of this size and type, surveys and community meetings. He said that while there is no hard data relative to whether this would offset the strain on other uses, his sense is that it would. Councilmember Cook-Kallio struggled to understand the apparent resistance to a dog park, but said she could support waiting to discuss this at the joint workshop. Councilmember Narum concurred. Mr. Bocian explained that dog parks do not tend to automatically inspire neighborhood acceptance. Location is a common objection, particularly the proximity to residences and children's play areas. In looking at this, staff felt Site 13 was particularly desirable because of its proximity to the Marilyn Kane Trail, size, parking, and relative isolation. Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing. Joe Streng, Parks and Recreation Commission, stated that the American Kennel Club recommends that dog parks be of one to two acres in size, preferably with separate areas for large and small dogs. He stated that in addition to being cited as the top need for this community in the Draft Master Plan, the Planning Commission has long been told that Bemal would be considered as a location to place a dog park. It was not until the Commission reviewed the Oak Woodland Plan that it was told there would be no consideration for its placement anywhere on the Bemal Community Park land. He explained that he voted no on the Oak Woodland schematic, despite his liking the design, because to approve it without fully evaluating whether Measure P allows for a dog park here would be a mistake. Dog parks were discussed as a possible use for this property by many community groups throughout the master planning process. While staff has proposed several other sites, their feasibility is questionable for a number of reasons and the Oak Woodland site provides a wonderful opportunity for nearby residents. He asked that the Council keep its options open and direct staff to conduct further exploration regarding the feasibility of carving out one to two acres on a 40-acre site for this use. City Council Minutes Page 7 of 15 February 4,2014