My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
management allocations approved for the project will be included in the proposed development <br /> agreement and extended into the future for the term of the development agreement. The <br /> applicant's Growth Management request does not need to be acted upon by the Planning <br /> Commission as it requires City Council decision only. <br /> Hacienda Owners Association <br /> The Hacienda Owners Association has the authority to review and approve the proposed <br /> development before action is taken by the City. A letter of support from Hacienda is attached. <br /> V. PUD CONSIDERATIONS <br /> The Zoning Ordinance of the Municipal Code sets forth purposes of the Planned Unit <br /> Development District and "considerations"to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development <br /> plan. <br /> 1. Whether the plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br /> welfare. <br /> The proposed project, as conditioned, meets all applicable City standards concerning <br /> public health, safety, and welfare. The subject development would include the installation <br /> of all required on-site utilities with connections to municipal systems in order to serve the <br /> new development. The project will not generate volumes of traffic that cannot be <br /> accommodated by existing or already planned improvements for City streets and <br /> intersections in the area. The structures would be designed to meet the requirements of <br /> the Uniform Building Code, Fire Code, and other applicable City codes. The proposed <br /> development is compatible with the adjacent uses and would be consistent with the existing <br /> scale and character of the area. The project also would provide affordable rental housing <br /> and help the City to meet its requirements for provision of lower income housing. <br /> Therefore, staff believes that the proposed PUD development plan is in the best interests of <br /> the public health, safety, and general welfare, and that this finding can be made. <br /> 2. Whether the plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and any applicable <br /> specific plan. <br /> The site's General Plan Land Use Designation of"Mixed Use/Business Park" allows <br /> residential uses. The proposed density of 30 dwelling residential units per acre is <br /> consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project would further several General Plan <br /> Programs and Policies encouraging new housing to be developed in infill and peripheral <br /> areas which are adjacent to existing residential development, near transportation hubs, or <br /> local-serving commercial areas and for the City to attain a variety of housing sizes, types, <br /> densities, designs, and prices which meet the existing and projected needs of all economic <br /> segments of the community. <br /> Staff concludes that the proposed development plan is consistent with the City's General <br /> Plan, and staff believes that this finding can be made. <br /> PUD-103/Summerhill Apartment Communities Planning Commission <br /> Page 28 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.