12 ATTACHMENT 6 - Laserfiche WebLink

3. Is the revised building design acceptable? The Commission thought the revisions improved the project. 4. Is the revised site layout with living units over parking by Buildings A and B acceptable? The Commission agreed that the project needs to meet the required 30 units per acre density requirement and found that it is acceptable to locate the units over parking. 5. Would the Planning Commission support the requested exception if the project were to move forward as proposed? Having learned the requested setback exception would allow room to provide parallel parking along curbside and therefore to create a street coming into the project, the Commission indicated it would support the requested exception. 6. Is the revised landscaping in the rear acceptable? The Commission thought the revised landscaping in the rear was acceptable. In terms of the proposed block wall on the southern property line, the Commission requested additional information from the applicant concerning how much noise would be absorbed and how much would be reflected back by the block wall. In addition, the Commission discussed. the carport structure being proposed near the westerly property line, and found opinion to be divided between providing amenities (carports) to the tenants vs. meeting the required setback. II. SITE DESCRIPTION AND SURROUNDING AREA The subject site is located on the south side of West Las Positas Boulevard, across from Thomas Hart Middle School, within the Hacienda Business Park. The subject 59-acre site and the adjoining 6.7 acre site to the east are collectively referred as the 12.6-acre Site#9 of the Design Guidelines. Please see aerial map below. PUD-103/Summerhill Apartment Communities Planning Commission Page 5 of 34