My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> positive results for everyone. He stated that their outreach efforts have included the <br /> following: <br /> • Community open house on September 4, 2013; <br /> • Planning Commission Work Session on September 11, 2013; <br /> • Individual outreach with neighbors in September and October of 2013; <br /> • Neighborhood meeting on October 6, 2013; <br /> • Community meeting on October 20, 2013; <br /> • Distributed a FAQ sheet and met with neighbors to review and go over all issues in <br /> November 2013; and <br /> • Planning Commission Work Session on January 22, 2014. <br /> Mr. Ebrahimi stated that when they presented their project to the Commission at its first <br /> Work Session in September 2013, the Commission provided positive feedback on the <br /> proposed design, gave several suggestions, and encouraged them to continue to meet with <br /> the neighbors, hear their concerns, and work with them to come up with a viable solution <br /> that would work for this site and the neighborhood. He noted that staff had summarized the <br /> project well, and he would like to give just a little more detail on how they came about these <br /> changes and how they were incorporated into the project. He indicated that the <br /> Commission gave eight recommendations: <br /> 1. Provide a two-story view of Buildings C and D from the vantage point of the Parkside <br /> neighborhood; do not increase the heights of Buildings A and 8, the four-story <br /> buildings along West Las Positas Boulevard. <br /> The units on Buildings C and D were redesigned to eliminate the third story of the <br /> units facing the Parkside neighborhood while keeping the three-story element facing <br /> north towards the interior of the project site. While this design eliminates the third <br /> floor requested by the Parkside neighborhood, it also limits the number of units that <br /> must be relocated elsewhere in the project, thereby avoiding the need to increase <br /> the heights of Buildings A and B. A slide illustrated the two-story portion of <br /> Buildings C and D, which is visible from the south, which the three-story portion is <br /> visible from the north towards West Las Positas Boulevard. <br /> 2. Increase the open space grass area within the project. <br /> The size of the open field in the central area was increased while still complying with <br /> the Statewide water ordinance. <br /> 3. Remove direct access from West Las Positas Boulevard to the open space area of <br /> the project. <br /> Access to the project open space along West Las Positas Boulevard was relocated <br /> and the entrance was gated for added security. Individual apartment units along <br /> West Las Positas Boulevard will still have direct access to the public sidewalk, but <br /> private open space remains secure and closed. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 2/26/2014 Page 2 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.