My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• One of the affordable 1-bedroom units, one affordable 2-bedroom units and one <br /> affordable 3-bedroom units shall be fully accessible for the physically disabled. Unit <br /> design shall include amenities such as grab bars, modified case work and bathroom <br /> facilities and other amenities deem significant for disabled access <br /> • In lieu of providing the 27 rent restricted units, the developer would pay an in-lieu fee of <br /> $2,300,000. The option of paying this fee or providing the units resides with the City <br /> and must be determined within 45 days of the developer notifying the City that it intends <br /> to apply for a building permit. <br /> • Identifies a HUD income source to be used for calculating Annual Household Income <br /> required to determine project eligibility. <br /> • Specifies that the AHA would not apply to the land in the event the PUD expires and the <br /> project is not built. <br /> Regarding compliance with the Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance's, the unit mix meets the <br /> requirement that 15% of the units be rent restricted. It does not however, fully meet the IZO's <br /> requirement that all for the affordable units be affordable to very low (50% AMI) and low income <br /> (80%) of the Area Median Income. Nevertheless, it is consistent with the AHA approved <br /> previously by the City Council for the California Center and the Aud der Maur developments <br /> and staff assumes that this level of affordability will be consistent with Council expectations for <br /> this project. All other items, including perpetuity, the disbursement of affordable units <br /> throughout the development, etc. are consistent with the IZO. <br /> Regarding compliance with the City's Housing Site Standards and Design Guidelines which <br /> stipulate that 10% of the affordable units will be 3-bedroom units and 35% will be 2-bedroom <br /> units, the proposed agreement calls for 11% of the affordable units to be 3-bedroom units and <br /> 33% of the affordable units to be 2-bedroom which staff determines to be consistent with the <br /> Design Guidelines since an additional unit would exceed the target percentage. <br /> Regarding the option for the developer to pay $2,300,000 rather than providing affordable units, <br /> staff supports this alternative primarily because it could provide the City with all or a significant <br /> portion of the funding needed to develop, or assist in developing, an additional affordable <br /> project with deeper levels of affordability than provided in this project. Further, it could be used <br /> to develop programs or other options for creating housing for lower income households. In <br /> addition, the Commission may recall that the City has committed $8 million of its Lower Income <br /> Housing Fund to the Kottinger Place development project and this in lieu payment would <br /> represent a significant contribution toward replacing those funds for future uses. The in lieu fee <br /> equals $12,994/unit which is roughly equivalent to the $13,043/unit which was approved for the <br /> Auf der Maur development. <br /> As outlined in the IZO, the Housing Commission's role is to recommend the City Council <br /> accept, reject or amend the terms of the attached AHA. The Commission may also make <br /> recommendations to the Planning Commission concerning conformance with the IZO. However, <br /> the Planning Commission does not have an identified role in determining project affordability, <br /> Page -5 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.