My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
031814
>
12 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:28:43 PM
Creation date
3/12/2014 3:53:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENT 6
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> come through and done. He noted that they have added a lot of articulation to these <br /> buildings and have improved the look a lot with all of the railings, the wrought iron, the <br /> gates, the roof changes, they extra brick. He further noted that the applicants have done <br /> everything the Commission has asked for, and he really thinks it is time to move on. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor moved to find that the conditions described in California <br /> Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15162 have not occurred as described in <br /> the Addendum to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR); that the <br /> previously prepared SEIR, including the adopted CEQA Findings and Statement of <br /> Overriding Considerations, and the Addendum to the SEIR are adequate to serve as <br /> the environmental documentation for this project and satisfy all the requirements of <br /> CEQA, re are no new or changed circumstances or information which require <br /> additional California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review of the project, and <br /> that the proposed PUD Development Plan and Development Agreement are <br /> consistent with the General Plan; to make the PUD findings for the proposed <br /> Development Plan as listed in the staff report; to find that the exceptions to the <br /> Housing Site Development Standards and Design Guidelines as listed in the staff <br /> report are appropriate; and to recommend approval to the City Council of Case <br /> PUD-103, subject to the Conditions of Approval as listed in Exhibit A of the staff <br /> report with the modifications listed in the staff memo dated February 26, 2014, and of <br /> Case P14-0086, the Development Agreement for the project, as shown in Exhibit B of <br /> the staff report. <br /> Commissioner Allen seconded the motion. <br /> ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: Commissioners Allen, O'Connor, Olson, Pearce,and Ritter <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> RECUSED: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> Resolution No. PC-2014-09 recommending approval to the City Council of Case <br /> PUD-103, and Resolution No. PC-2014-10 recommending approval to the City Council <br /> of Case P14-0086, were entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 2/26/2014 Page 13 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.