Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that these drawings do not show everything super clearly: there are those <br /> roof elements on the bottom that were there even the first time they designed it which are <br /> going to provide a little bit of shadow; then there are the dormers which were clearly a plus. <br /> He pointed out that this does fade away from them, and the view of the elevation like this <br /> cannot really be seen from anywhere in real life. He added that the textured tiles are <br /> something that was definitely an improvement, and staff was satisfied with that. He <br /> reiterated that there is something more architecturally that can be done, but it was not <br /> necessarily something the neighbors really wanted. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that she wanted to bring up one thing as the Commission is <br /> forwarding this to the City Council, and she wants to be sure the Commission has <br /> exhausted all the things it talked about so the Council does not have to start fresh. She <br /> indicated that she reviewed all the Minutes and was walking the Arroyo today and taking a <br /> look at the buildings and at the fact that a lot of the homes that back to the Arroyo have <br /> gates into the Arroyo. She noted that she missed only one Work Session and does not <br /> recall discussing it at the other Work Session, and she had not seen any conversation <br /> about what seems to her an amenity to this project for the people who live there would be <br /> to have a gate out to the Arroyo. She indicated that she is sure they will have this <br /> conversation at the Council level, and she would like to have this conversation at this level. <br /> She stated that she does not really want to make people walk all the way out to West Las <br /> Positas Boulevard and walk down West Las Positas Boulevard to get to the Arroyo, and <br /> she wanted to know what the Commission thinks about that, given that the Commission <br /> has not talked about it yet. <br /> Chair Olson stated that the Commission did talk about it and that he is on record saying he <br /> was not in favor of a gate for security reasons. <br /> Commissioner Pearce inquired if that discussion was held at the January Work Session <br /> because it was not reflected in the Minutes. <br /> Commissioner Ritter stated that the Commission talked more about a trail connecting than <br /> a gate. He indicated that from what he remembers, the Commission did not necessarily <br /> talk about a gate but that he remembers Chair Olson saying he did not want access in and <br /> out. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he thinks that was the Commission's general <br /> consensus of the number of people that were present, and the Commission had concerns <br /> from the neighbors with this many people having access. He added that there was also the <br /> animals and dogs allowed to live here and so the Commission thought that was an okay <br /> change because there was initially an access. <br /> Commissioner Pearce stated that was right, and then it was gone and there was no other <br /> conversation about it. <br /> Commissioner Ritter noted that they still have the alleyway. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 2/26/2014 Page 10 of 13 <br />