My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
030414
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2014 1:43:55 PM
Creation date
3/3/2014 11:54:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
3/4/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
411'urid�- !� if CMAT <br /> cue <br /> From: Joanne Hall <br /> Ater istrit�utic�n )t 'ac cil <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 4:42 PM Packet <br /> To: Anne Fox; Mayor and City Council �. <br /> Cc: Brian Dolan; Janice Stern; Maria Hoe y; Pleasanton�tClerk <br /> Subject: RE: East Side Specific Plan - place it on hold <br /> Dear Ms. Fox: <br /> Thank you for taking the time to write and share your concerns about the East Side Specific Plan. This <br /> email acknowledges receipt of your email to the City Council and the City Manager. Thank you again <br /> for your interest in the City of Pleasanton. <br /> Joanne Hall <br /> Public Information Officer <br /> From: Anne Fox - <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 4:23 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council <br /> Subject: East Side Specific Plan - place it on hold <br /> Hello, <br /> The Chain of Lakes was supposed to be a recreational area and a community separator between the City of Livermore <br /> and City of Pleasanton. If designed with recreation in mind, it could be a regional jewel that future generations could <br /> enjoy. <br /> As it is now, Pleasanton contemplates it being a dumping ground for high density housing. <br /> I believe the East Side Specific Plan should be put on indefinite hold,that there should be a reassessment of the <br /> recreational potential of the area, and that the City of Livermore and EBRPD and the Livermore Area Park District should <br /> work with Pleasanton to design something we all as residents can be proud of. The East Side Specific Plan primarily <br /> should be focused on recreation, not urban development. <br /> Another issue is"the outside the UGB area" issue. Expanding the UGB requires a vote of the people. Unless the city <br /> wishes to embark on years of litigation for violating the UGB,the 1996 UGB ballot separate measure should be adhered <br /> to. From the UGB measure: "Upon the effective date of this initiative,the City, and its departments, boards, <br /> commissions, officers and employees, shall not grant, or by inaction allow to be approved by operation of law, any <br /> general plan amendment, rezoning, specific plan, subdivision map, conditional use permit, building permit or any other <br /> discretionary entitlement,which is inconsistent with this initiative." <br /> Thank you, <br /> Anne Fox <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.