Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 1 - Example of BMR percentages needed in to achieve RHNA objectives on <br /> currently identified HDR designated inventory <br /> Table D: <br /> Residential Projects With Development Entitlements <br /> Without Building Permits Or Not Occupied As Of 12/31/2013 <br /> AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI Total Project <br /> Entitled Sites 0-49% 50% 51-79% 80% 81-120% Units <br /> Auf der Maur 0 10(3%) 0 17 (5%) 318(92%) 345 <br /> CA Center 0 8 (3%) 0 15 (5%) 282 (92%) 305 <br /> Pls Gateway(30du/acre) 0 16(8%) 0 16(8%) 178 (82%) 210 <br /> St. Anton Hacienda 0 18(14%) 0 18 (14%) 132 (64%) 168 <br /> Total Entitled Units 0 52 0 66 910 1,028 <br /> % BMR achieved 0 5% 0 6% 89% <br /> Table E: <br /> Example Model That Satisfies Pleasanton's RHNA <br /> On Vacant or Underutilized Land Designated for Residential Development <br /> With No Entitlements Identified for 30 du/acre Zoning <br /> AMI AMI AMI <br /> 0-50% 51-80% 81-120% TOTAL <br /> SITES (55%of Project Units) (27%of Project Units) (18%of Project Units) UNITS <br /> Roche 205 100 67 372 <br /> BART 151 74 49 274 <br /> Sheraton 54 27 18 99 <br /> Stoneridge 48 24 16 88 <br /> Kaiser 101 49 33 183 <br /> CM Capital 110 54 36 200 <br /> TOTAL <br /> BMR Units 669 328 219 1216 <br />