My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN121713
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
CCMIN121713
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2014 4:23:36 PM
Creation date
2/20/2014 4:23:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tassano said that while they have never removed a speed lump, it could be accomplished by the <br /> City's own streets crew. <br /> Councilmember Brown said she could support the item but would like the budgeted amount amended <br /> from $405,000 to $300,000 with perhaps a 15% contingency. <br /> Mr. Fialho explained that tonight's action would only be to approve the project and direct staff to return <br /> with a plan to incorporate the project in the City's capital financing, at which time staff will have a better <br /> estimate cif actual project costs. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio confirmed that staff understood her desire to include a phased approach based <br /> on available funds. Mayor Thorne amended his motion accordingly and Councilmember Narum <br /> accepted the amendment. <br /> Councilmember Brown asked Mr. Fialho to work with the police department to monitor speed on the <br /> street. <br /> Councilmember Pentin stated his support and requested that staff examine the proposed improvements <br /> for consistency or inconsistency with the Bicycle Pedestrian Master Plan. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Thorne/Narum to approve the Black Avenue Traffic Calming Plan and direct <br /> staff to design a phased implementation based on available funds. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Cook-Kallio, Narum, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> 13. Public Hearing: P13-2446, P13-2447, and P13-2448, City of Pleasanton — Consider: <br /> (1) amendments to the General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan, and Downtown Design Guidelines <br /> relating to historic preservation and residential design within the Downtown Specific Plan Area; <br /> and (2) introduction of an Ordinance approving amendments to the Pleasanton Municipal Code <br /> relating to story pole requirements and demolition by neglect within the Downtown Specific Plan <br /> Area — Continued Public Hearing to January 21, 2014 <br /> Mayor Thorne advised that since a number of people with an interest in the item could not attend <br /> tonight that staff would make its presentation, the Council would ask questions and take public <br /> testimony and then continue the public hearing to January 21, 2014. He asked that any members of the <br /> public who speak tonight present only new information if they choose to speak on the matter again in <br /> January. <br /> Community Development Director Dolan presented the staff report. He stated that the Historic <br /> Preservation Task Force, comprised of 2 Planning Commissioners and 5 At-Large members of the <br /> community, was created by the Council in October 2011. The task force was created to review the <br /> City's current historic preservation policies, guidelines and processes, with a focus on exploring <br /> whether these adequately protected the City's historic resources and streamlining the current process <br /> to make outcomes more predictable. The task force met 12 times and also held a large open public <br /> workshop as well as 4 individual outreach meetings with different community groups. In June 2013 the <br /> task force checked in with the City Council, received feedback, and subsequently prepared a set of <br /> recommerdations it felt the Council could support. <br /> Mr. Dolan reviewed the concepts presented to the Council in June and summarized the Council's <br /> position at that time. <br /> • Creation of a local historic district— Council did not support <br /> • Creation of local standards — Council majority did not support <br /> City Council Minutes Page 6 of 20 December 17, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.