My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
030414
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:08:30 PM
Creation date
2/12/2014 3:40:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/18/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
8
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 8 <br /> THE CITY OF <br /> slim —q t /1 seam 1 <br /> ASANTONC <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> Date: December 9, 2013 <br /> To: Planning Commission <br /> From: Marion Pavan, Associate Planner <br /> Subject: Item 6.a., P13-2028 <br /> Page 6 of the Planning Commission staff report, Temporary Occupancy and Application for <br /> Design Review, stated: <br /> Temporary Occupancy and Application for Design Review <br /> The applicants applied for and were denied a permit for Temporary Occupancy (TCO). <br /> The applicants appealed the Chief Building and Safety Official's position to the City <br /> Manager who agreed to issue a TCO, allowing the applicants to occupy the residence <br /> after they agreed to submit an application for Design Review Approval to the Planning <br /> Division and to deposit the sum of $80,000 with the City to correct the remaining items <br /> identified by the RHADC as not complying with the RHADG. The applicants submitted <br /> the cash deposit and the Design Review application and were issued a TCO to occupy <br /> their home on June 28, 2013. <br /> The cash deposit was actually $100,000 not $80,000 as stated in the staff report. The <br /> corrected section should read as: <br /> Temporary Occupancy and Application for Design Review <br /> The applicants applied for and were denied a permit for Temporary Occupancy (TCO). <br /> The applicants appealed the Chief Building and Safety Official's position to the City <br /> Manager who agreed to issue a TCO, allowing the applicants to occupy the residence <br /> after they agreed to submit an application for Design Review Approval to the Planning <br /> Division and to deposit the sum of $100,000 $80,000 with the City to correct the <br /> remaining items identified by the RHADC as not complying with the RHADG. The <br /> applicants submitted the cash deposit and the Design Review application and were <br /> issued a TCO to occupy their home on June 28, 2013. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.