My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
020414
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:00:10 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 3:55:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
5
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P13-2458, Downtown Revitalization District In-Lieu Parking Fee <br /> Environmental Checklist <br /> f) I3e served by a landfill with <br /> sufficient permitted capacity to X <br /> accommodate the project's solid <br /> waste disposal needs? <br /> g) Comply with federal, state, and <br /> local statutes and regulations X <br /> related to solid waste? <br /> Discussion <br /> a.-g. No construction or demolition is proposed as part of the PMC amendment. The <br /> Pleasanton General Plan EIR required no mitigation/improvement measures for utility <br /> and service system impacts and deemed all utility and service system impacts without <br /> mitigation as being less than significant. The PMC amendment is not anticipated to <br /> create any new or additional impacts which have not already been studied in the <br /> Pleasanton General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan EIRs. Therefore, these would be <br /> of less than significant impact. <br /> 5.14 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY <br /> Environmental Setting <br /> No physical changes are proposed as part of this PMC amendment. The Downtown <br /> Specific Plan amenities, such as mini-plazas and similar amenities, were addressed in <br /> the Downtown Specific Plan and its corresponding EIR. <br /> Standards of Significance <br /> For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the <br /> proposed project would: <br /> 0 Result in substantially degrading water quality or violate any water quality <br /> objectives set by the State Water Resources Control Board due to increased <br /> sediments or other contaminants generated by consumption and/or operation <br /> activities; or, <br /> 0 Result in exposing people or property to the risk of injury and damage in the event <br /> of a 100-year flood. <br /> 42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.