My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
020414
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:01:44 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 3:30:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. GENERAL FUND REVENUES <br /> This chapter describes the methodology and assumptions used for revenue projections in this <br /> analysis. Table 10 summarizes annual General Fund revenues at buildout. Several General <br /> Fund revenue items are not forecasted because they are not expected to be affected by new <br /> growth or are cost recovery and are therefore reflected in offsetting cost reductions, as further <br /> described below. <br /> Property Tax <br /> Property tax in California is based on 1.0 percent of assessed value and will be collected from <br /> new development in Pleasanton. The property tax revenue portion accruing to the City's General <br /> Fund is 24.6 percent of the 1.0 percent based on the City's property tax capture.6 The <br /> remaining property tax goes to other taxing entities, including the State, schools, BART, and <br /> Alameda County. The property tax proceeds are shown in Table 11. <br /> The City's total assessed value growth will also be subject to much more complex range of <br /> internal and external variables. For example, future values could be driven by the quality of life <br /> factors, such as the level of service provided by the City as well as broader socioeconomic factors <br /> that affect property value growth. In addition, the relative fiscal benefit from nonresidential <br /> development will depend on market demand and the degree to which tenants seek new <br /> developed space in the City. <br /> Property Tax In Lieu of VLF <br /> In 2004, the State of California adjusted the method for sharing VLF with local jurisdictions. <br /> While the actual amount of VLF decreased for each jurisdiction, the State backfilled those losses <br /> by sharing more of the property taxes than previously. The property tax backfill was based on <br /> the lost revenues in the initial year and since then has been adjusted based on the proportionate <br /> increase in assessed values each year. The Project will add an additional 22 percent to the <br /> current assessed value in Pleasanton (assuming no other assessed value growth) and will <br /> generate the same increased percentage in in-lieu VLF revenues (see Table 11). <br /> Document Transfer Tax <br /> Document transfer tax (also known as property transfer tax) is collected by the City when the <br /> ownership of residential and commercial property changes. The City's General Fund receives <br /> $0.55 of every $1,000 in value sold. This analysis assumes that for-sale residential uses change <br /> ownership more frequently than residential rental and commercial uses. This approach results in <br /> the property transfer tax estimate of $124,000 a year, as shown in Table 12. Property transfer <br /> tax proceeds vary year-to-year based on the sales volume. <br /> 6 The City collects special taxes in addition to the 1.0 percent of value; these taxes are excluded from <br /> this analysis as they typically apply to specific uses and do not impact the General Fund. <br /> Economic&Planning Systems, Inc. 25 P:\121000\121062Pleasanton\Report\121062RePort_FINAL.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.