SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL - Laserfiche WebLink

Karen Gonzales Subject: FW: Measure PP Closed Session From: Joanne Hall Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:16 PM SUPPLLMtNfAL MNIAtkHIAL To: Pleasanton City Clerk; Brian Dolan; Maria Hoey Provided to the City Council Subject: Fwd: Measure PP Closed Session After Distribution of Packet Date Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Matt Sullivan Date: January 29, 2014 at 2:07:54 PM PST To: Mayor and City Council Subject: Measure PP Closed Session Dear Mayor and Council, I understand that you have a Closed Session tonight regarding Measure PP and related issues. I also have heard that some Councilmember's may be getting impatient with the negotiation process with our group. I can assure you we are working diligently to respond to the ordinance that you provided us in December. We do not have a staff, or a lawyer that comes at no cost to us personally, therefore we do the detailed work to examine and provide comments to the ordinance around our family and work schedules. I would also like to remind you it took the city over three months to respond to our first set of comments in December. We have being working on your offer for about a month - including over the holidays. As I expressed to Nelson, we need a couple of weeks to pull all our comments together, have them reviewed by our attorney, and then provide a response to you. I told Nelson that we would be happy to have a status meeting with the subcommittee now to give you an update and to fill you in on our broad concerns with your proposal. We tentatively selected February 3rd or 4th, but it turned out those dates would not work for the Council. It appears now that this meeting is being pushed out to the second week of February. I don't think any of us wants litigation, and that we can work this out without going down that path. I would ask the council to not short circuit this process and avoid that unpleasant outcome. Thank you 1