My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
020414
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 3:01:07 PM
Creation date
1/29/2014 3:02:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
at a May 16, 2006 City Council meeting during which the Council approved the planning <br /> documents, including an "Illustrative Site Plan" that identified specific uses for various areas of <br /> the Bernal property. <br /> The May 16, 2006 City Council meeting is important in relation to a dog park as it was at this <br /> meeting that the Council considered recommendations from the Planning Commission, Parks <br /> and Recreation Commission and the Youth Master Plan Implementation Committee to amend <br /> the Bernal Specific Plan/ Illustrative Site Plan to include a dog park. The Park and Recreation <br /> Commission's recommendation was the most specific in that it stated "add a 1/4 to 1/2 acre dog <br /> park to the Bernal Specific Plan's Illustrative Site Plan in an area located away from the railroad <br /> tracks." The addition of a dog park was also detailed in the agenda report as a decision issue. <br /> During the course of the May 16 meeting, Mayor Hosterman requested input regarding the <br /> addition of a dog park, but its inclusion was rejected by the City Council. As such, the final <br /> Bernal Specific Plan/ Illustrative Plan was approved without a dog park. Following this action, <br /> the City Council placed the Bernal Specific Plan on the November 6, 2006 general election as <br /> Measure P where it was subsequently approved by the voters. <br /> At the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting on October 10, 2013, the Commission <br /> reviewed the Schematic Plan for the Oak Woodland area of the Bernal Property and expressed <br /> general approval of the overall plan, however asked staff as to why an off-leash dog area was <br /> not included in the Plan. In response, staff expressed that inclusion of a dog park on the Bernal <br /> Community Park or Oak Woodland would be inconsistent with the Bernal Specific Plan adopted <br /> by the voters. As a result, the Commission elected not to take action on the plan pending <br /> further review of the potential for including of a dog park as part of this phase of Bernal Property <br /> development. <br /> Notwithstanding the above, following the Commission's October 10, 2013 meeting, staff <br /> received an email from Chairperson Streng requesting additional clarification regarding <br /> opportunities and restrictions related to siting a dog park on the Bernal Property. A summary of <br /> the requested clarification is "how is the inclusion of a dog park in the Community Park <br /> prohibited by Measure P particularly when the Bernal Park Master Plan the Specific Plan <br /> states that other uses may be approved by the City Council?" <br /> In addition to the information detailed above, there are actually two dimensions to this question. <br /> First, the potential for including a dog park within the 318 acre Bernal Specific Plan area and <br /> second, including a dog park within the 50 acres designated for the Bernal Community Park. <br /> Regarding the Bernal Community Park area, the adopted Bernal Park Master Plan includes a <br /> listing of facilities/uses that are included in the Plan's Master Site Plan (Attachment 2) and this <br /> list includes a dog park. However, the list is not intended to be general but is specifically <br /> intended to highlight the facilities/uses included in the Master Site Plan which does not include a <br /> dog park. Staffs position is that the inclusion of a dog park in this list (Attachment 2) is a <br /> document editing oversight that may be related to a previous draft Master Site Plan (Attachment <br /> 3) that included a dog park. However, the dog park was eliminated from the Illustrative Plan <br /> prior to the City Council's May 6 action and as indicated above, the Council rejected <br /> recommendations from various commissions to include one in the final document. Further, <br /> Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.