My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2014
>
012114
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/18/2015 2:57:30 PM
Creation date
1/15/2014 2:11:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/21/2014
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
9
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 of 301 lots, excluding condominiums, townhomes, and small-lot PUDs). Many of these shallower <br /> lots already have detached garages. While staff does not foresee that the proposed language would <br /> create a problem for a large majority of Downtown lots, staff recommends that lot depth be added to the <br /> exception language of the draft policy as shown below(possible change is shown underlined): <br /> When a lot exceeds 60 feet in width, detached garages are required and shall be located to the rear of <br /> the site. Exceptions can be granted due to a physical constraint that prevents compliance such as an <br /> existing heritage-sized tree or inadequate lot depth. <br /> Cutoff Year for Determining Historical Significance—Mayor Thorne and some members of the <br /> public had mentioned the possibility of using a date other than"built before 1942" in the local criteria <br /> for determining if a residential structure is considered a historic resource. <br /> There are approximately 189 residentially-zoned residences in the Downtown Specific Plan Area that <br /> were built before 1942 (based on County Assessor's data). However, there are only about 32 <br /> residentially zoned residences that were built before 1900. Staff has included photographs of a few <br /> Downtown residences that were built between 1930 and 1940. Staff continues to believe that that the <br /> "built before 1942" date is appropriate to use. <br /> Use of Story Poles—Councilmember Cook-Kallio requested that staff provide a few examples of when <br /> story poles might be required. As indicated in the draft ordinance language, the Zoning Administrator or <br /> Planning Commission could require story poles for a two-story addition to an existing house or a new <br /> house within the Downtown Specific Plan Area. In the Downtown, new single-family residences not <br /> part of a PUD development and two-story additions are subject to design review approval by the Zoning <br /> Administrator. The Planning Commission would only review these kinds of projects if the Zoning <br /> Administrator's decision was appealed or if the Zoning Administrator referred an application directly to <br /> the Planning Commission. <br /> The Historic Preservation Task Force had discussed the possibility of making story poles mandatory in <br /> all cases, but decided on leaving some discretion on the part of City staff where it felt story poles <br /> weren't warranted. Staff would generally require story poles for all new homes, but there could be some <br /> two-story additions that wouldn't warrant story poles (e.g., a small two-story addition to an existing two- <br /> story home). <br /> Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation—Councilmembers had requested a copy of <br /> the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation since there were referenced in some of the <br /> proposed policies. The 10 standards are listed below: <br /> 1. A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to <br /> its distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. <br /> 2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved. The removal of distinctive <br /> materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will <br /> be avoided. <br /> 3. Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create <br /> a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other <br /> historic properties, will not be undertaken. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.