My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
121713
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2013 12:55:52 PM
Creation date
12/9/2013 12:55:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Locational Standards <br /> Staff looked at many other wireless ordinances prior to embarking on this code <br /> change, including ordinances from the neighboring cities of Livermore, Dublin, <br /> Walnut Creek and the Town of Danville. Each ordinance was unique in its locational <br /> standards and processing requirements, e.g., the type of review that is required <br /> generally changed depending on the proposed location of a facility. It is worth noting <br /> that every other city ordinance that staff reviewed allowed wireless facilities to be <br /> located on residential property (though the review is usually more onerous if a carrier <br /> is proposing to place a facility on a residential property). <br /> a. Prioritizing Zoning Districts Where Facilities are Allowed <br /> The intent of the proposed ordinance amendments is to improve <br /> telecommunications coverage throughout the City without sacrificing the <br /> aesthetic ideals that are important to the citizens of Pleasanton. With that in <br /> mind, the proposed ordinance creates a prioritization system for locating new <br /> facilities.' The ranking works as follows. Carriers must locate a new facility in <br /> the Commercial, Office, Industrial, or Mixed Use (C, 0, I, or M-U) zoning districts. <br /> If a carrier can show that it is not feasible to locate in one of those districts, it <br /> must locate in the Agricultural, Public, or Public and Institutional zoning districts <br /> (A, P, or P&I). A wireless carrier may demonstrate feasibility by providing <br /> evidence demonstrating that there are no other locations in the prioritized zone <br /> that: meet the applicant's coverage needs; are structurally or technically feasible; <br /> or are available to lease or otherwise economically feasible. The proposed <br /> ordinance also includes language allowing the City to hire an expert to review the <br /> carrier's evidence, at the carrier's expense, in order to determine whether other <br /> locations may be feasible. <br /> Finally, new facilities are prohibited in all other zoning designations with one <br /> exception. New facilities will be permitted on parcels containing a City water tank <br /> (or on an adjacent parcel) so long as certain requirements are met. For the <br /> purposes of the wireless ordinance, if a parcel is zoned Planned Unit <br /> Development (PUD), staff shall look to the zoning districts identified under the <br /> particular PUD. In other words, if the zoning designation is PUD-I/C, then this <br /> would be considered Industrial or Commercial and would fall under the first <br /> ranked category. If the zoning designation is PUD-HDR, then this would be <br /> considered High Density Residential and a facility would be prohibited from <br /> locating there. <br /> 1 The City of Livermore's ordinance prioritizes locations as follows: 1) Education and Institution such as <br /> public golf courses, water tank sites, schools and parks; 2) Industrial; 3) Commercial; 4) Office or <br /> Neighborhood Mixed Use; 5) Open Space, Airport-Service, Agriculture; and 6) Residential, Transect, <br /> Neighborhood Mixed Use <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.