My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
121713
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2013 12:55:52 PM
Creation date
12/9/2013 12:55:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
by the Federal Communications Commission and California Public Utilities Commission-to <br /> 2. The types and range of sizes of antennas and equipment cabinets which could serve as <br /> 23. A USGS topographic map or survey,to scale,with existing topographic contours <br /> showing the proposed antennas and;accessory structures., and new roads in an area. <br /> 34. Title reports.Technical data related to the site selection process. <br /> • ; ; : - - • <br /> facility. As used herein, drive tests are field tests to demonstrate the coverage of a proposed <br /> •• • - • • • - - : ; • ••• •- eater perimeter of the radio signals that can be <br /> 46. installation of"story poles"to show the height or overall size of the proposed antennas or <br /> accessory structures. • " - " - • - - . • <br /> 7. A letter stating, wherever - • •• - •: -, •: • -- . . . • - been designed to <br /> 58. A letter stating specifically the reasons for not collocating on any existing personal <br /> wireless service facility tower or at any site with existing antennas within the city. The reasons <br /> for not collocating may include evidence that the existing facilities will not meet the provider's <br /> coverage needs, letters from personal wireless service providers with existing facilities stating <br /> reasons for not permitting collocation,or evidence that personal wireless service providers <br /> have not responded,or, if the reasons for refusal to collocate are structural,the structural <br /> calculations for review by the planning division. <br /> 69. Noise impact analysis. <br /> 7-1-0. A letter to the zoning administrator which describes in detail the maintenance program <br /> for the facilityies as well as a security plan to prevent unauthorized access and vandalism..- <br /> 8%f. Written proof of the availability of any required irrigation facilities on-site prior to permit <br /> issuance. This may be in the form of a letter from the owner of the land allowing the personal <br /> wireless service provider the use of required water facilities for landscaping. (Ord. 2000 § 1, <br /> 2009; Ord. 1743 § 1, 1998) <br /> 18.110.050 Locational Sstandards. <br /> A.A personal wireless service facility shall be a permitted use in any zoning district only if it <br /> chapter. <br /> A�. Locational Priorities <br /> For the purposes of this section, when a parcel is zoned PUD(Planned Unit Development), planning <br /> staff shall look to the zoning districts listed under the particular PUD and apply those zoning <br /> districts to this section. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.