14 - Laserfiche WebLink

2. All applicable fees including deposit fees for peer review. The Zoning Administrator is authorized at his/her discretion to employ on behalf of the City an independent technical expert to review any materials submitted by the applicant and to provide an analysis of issues including but not limited to, whether the wireless facility meets the emission standards set forth by the Federal Communications Commission, whether a a significant gap in coverage exists, whether there are alternative sites and the feasibility of those sites, whether there are ways to mitigate aesthetic impacts. The applicant shall pay all costs of the peer review consultant and shall submit a deposit for peer and staff review. 3: Title reports. 34. Site plan, landscape plan, and elevations drawn to scale. The elevation drawings shall include all buildings on which the personal wireless service facilities are proposed to be located. 4.5--Cross sections and floor plans, drawn to scale, if an antenna is proposed to be façade-or roof-mounted. 56. • •-• ; •---:• . •:• •• , •• : Bhefore and after photo-simulations and elevation drawings showing the height,design, color, and location of the proposed facility as viewed from public places and if requested by the Zoning Administrator, from private properties. 67. Proposed means of establishing and maintaining maximum visual screening dews of facilities, as needed,which includes submitting sample exterior materials and colors of towers,antennas, and accessory structures(such as equipment cabinets and structures), landscaping, and security fences. 7g. The number,type,--and dimensions of antennas,equipment cabinets, and related facilities proposed for use by the personal wireless service provider. If an applicant is proposing an emergency standby generator, include the unit's dimensions and specifications including noise emission levels. The size of equipment cabinets and related facilities are not required if the 89. A report from a structural engineer, licensed by the state, regarding the number and type of antennas that a proposed or existing structure is designed to support. 949. Justification of why the proposed height and visual impact of the personal wireless service facility cannot be reduced on the proposed site. 10-I-. A letter,including service area maps and other information demonstrating that the proposed location ••:• . •• •- , •: . • ., -. • • - •:- • --: is essential for of the personal wireless service provider to fulfill a significant gap in coverage. awerageneeds objective. A map based on drive tests(or similar engineering data) at the proposed site and its vicinity showing the estimated coverage area for the proposed personal wireless service facility. As used herein, drive tests are field tests to demonstrate the coverage of a proposed antenna in which one person holds a transmitter at the proposed site and another drives away from the site with a receiver to determine the outer perimeter of the radio signals that can be transmitted from the site, 112. A letter explaining the site selection process including information about three other sites which could service the same or similar coverage area and the reasons for their rejection, 3