Laserfiche WebLink
preservation ordinance, but instead wanted the existing Downtown historic preservation policies, <br /> guidelines, and processes be re-evaluated, these two sections of the General Plan would be <br /> deleted as shown in Exhibit D. <br /> Historic Context Statement <br /> As described by Marie Nelson from the California Office of Historic Preservation, historic <br /> context statements provide the basis for evaluating significance and integrity of a resource. The <br /> historic context statement is an organizing structure for grouping information about historic <br /> properties that share a common theme, place, and time. A historic context statement focuses on <br /> describing those historical development patterns within which the significance of a resource can <br /> be understood. <br /> The draft Pleasanton Downtown Historic Context Statement prepared for the Task Force in 2012 <br /> by Architectural Resources Group, Inc. identifies primary themes in the history of Pleasanton <br /> and connects those themes to the built environment by identifying property types associated <br /> with each theme. It provides a rationale for identifying historic resources that are important to <br /> Pleasanton as opposed to those important only to California history. As noted earlier, the Task <br /> Force is recommending it be used to help determine whether a residential structure is eligible for <br /> listing in the California Register and considered a historic structure. Each residential property in <br /> the Downtown Specific Plan Area that contains sufficient components of a residential property <br /> type described in the Context Statement would be determined to be eligible for the California <br /> Register, provided they have retained their integrity. Integrity is authenticity, or at a minimum, <br /> retention of those physical features that define why a property is significant. <br /> Staff is asking that the Planning Commission recommend that City Council accept the context <br /> statement. Staff notes that there are some minor edits that need to be made to the context <br /> statement which will be done after the Council takes action on the proposed amendments. <br /> Process Flow Charts <br /> The attached flow charts (Exhibit H) show the City process for a residential addition, a <br /> residential tear down and rebuild, new residential construction (i.e., a new house not involving <br /> demolition of an existing house), and a residential remodel. The flow charts will be integrated <br /> into a new public informational guide explaining the City's historic preservation policies and <br /> regulations, submittal requirements, and processes. The informational guide will be completed <br /> by staff after the Council takes action on the proposed draft amendments. The Commission does <br /> not need to take formal action on the flow charts, but any feedback is welcomed by staff. <br /> III. DISCUSSION <br /> Staff supports the proposed amendments and believes that they will help protect historic <br /> residential properties that are valued by the community from possible demolition. The <br /> amendments will also help streamline and eliminate uncertainty in the City's review process and <br /> eliminate inconsistencies between the Specific Plan policies and Downtown Design Guidelines. <br /> P13-2446/P13-4447/P13-4448 Page - 10- November 13, 2013 <br />