My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
121713
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2013 1:21:52 PM
Creation date
12/9/2013 12:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Should Design Review authority apply to the first floor of single-family homes? <br /> The Council did not support a change to require Design Review for modifications to the first <br /> floor(i.e., 10 ft. or below in height) of single-family homes and the Task Force's draft <br /> amendments do not include this requirement. However, the Task Force does support further <br /> discussion of this issue in the future. <br /> S. Should the existing historic preservation and design policies and guidelines be clarified in <br /> the Downtown Specific Plan and Downtown Design Guidelines? <br /> The Council agreed that the documents should be clarified to be clear and consistent. The <br /> Task Force's recommendation includes changes to make the documents clear and consistent. <br /> 6. Should process flow charts be created to help inform applicants of the various steps and <br /> decision points that are involved? <br /> The Council agreed that process flow charts be created and the Task Force supported the flow <br /> charts provided by staff(Exhibit H). The flow charts will be integrated into a new public <br /> informational guide explaining the City's historic preservation policies and regulations, <br /> submittal requirements, and processes. The informational guide will be completed by staff <br /> after the Council takes action on the proposed draft amendments. <br /> 7. Should a comprehensive resource survey be completed? <br /> The Council supported completing a professional comprehensive resource survey of the older <br /> structures Downtown to determine which structures are considered historic resources. <br /> Because the criteria to analyze whether a structure is historic or not first need to be <br /> determined (i.e., whether to continue to rely on the State's criteria or create a local standard <br /> for residential resources such as proposed by the Task Force), the survey will be conducted <br /> after the Council takes action on the proposed draft amendments. <br /> 8. Should a Mills Act Program be implemented? <br /> The Council did not support implementing a Mills Act Program and the Task Force's draft <br /> amendments do not include a provision to implement such a program. <br /> 9. Other direction provided by the City Council <br /> Councilmember Brown had mentioned her desire to see the use of story poles with any <br /> expansion of home Downtown subject to Design Review and to ensure that there are policies <br /> in place to prevent older homes from being demolished by neglect. These items are addressed <br /> in the Task Force's recommendations. <br /> P13-2446/P13-4447/P13-4448 Page - 4- November 13, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.