My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
120313
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2016 3:28:27 PM
Creation date
11/26/2013 12:50:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
12/3/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
hearings by the Planning and Housing Commissions before coming to the City Council in the spring for <br /> a decision. <br /> Mr. Bocian discussed the Disposition, Development and Loan Agreement (DDA) that memorializes the <br /> relationship between and sets forth the expectations of the city, the Housing Authority and MidPen. It <br /> also clarifies MidPen's role as the project developer, future owner of the site improvements and project <br /> operator. The DDA obligates MidPen to work through the project financing, obtain HUD approval for the <br /> demolition and disposition of Kottinger Place, and prepare and implement a tenant relocation plan. The <br /> DDA also obligates the city to provide up to $10 million in financial assistance, of which $2.8 million is a <br /> predevelopment loan and $7.2 million is to offset the overall cost of the project. The city is also <br /> obligated to work with Pleasanton Gardens to secure its site, enter into a ground lease for the site with <br /> a limited partnership controlled by MidPen for the purpose of owning and operating the improvements <br /> on the land, and to process the PUD. He noted that the latter is an agreement only to process, and not <br /> necessarily to approve, the PUD <br /> He reviewed the $2.8 million predevelopment loan, which is broken out into several components. The <br /> first disbursement of $408,000 is for work already completed and to be completed through the PUD <br /> process. Disbursement of the remaining funds is spread across critical points throughout the project. <br /> Once the project is funded, the ground lease in place and development process under the <br /> predevelopment loan will be transitioned into a new loan agreement for the full amount of up to $10 <br /> million. The loan note and DDA stipulate repayment terms at 3% interest, with the loan to be paid back <br /> through available cash flow. There are provisions that if there is not sufficient cash flow at the expiration <br /> of the ground lease then the loan would be forgiven. He noted that the city's contribution has been <br /> increased from $8 million to $10 million, though not due to an increase in project or construction costs. <br /> The conventional loan component of project financing generally ties the approval amount to projected <br /> cash flow, which relates to the amount of reimbursement expected from Section 8 vouchers. Those <br /> amounts have decreased since the original projection, which in turn reduces MidPen's ability to borrow <br /> on the project. Staff feels that reimbursement amounts may return to previous levels before the point at <br /> which a loan is secured, but is recommending that the Council approve the full $10 million to be safe. <br /> There is some financial risk related to predevelopment loan funds paid prior to approval of the PUD and <br /> demolition by HUD. In the event that the Council would not approve the PUD it would lose <br /> approximately $408,000. However, the city would receive all work done to date which could be re- <br /> bundled into another project. As part of the demolition and disposition approval, they are also asking <br /> HUD to approve a financing plan that utilizes project-based Section 8. While the DDA obligates all <br /> parties to look at alternative financing means if HUD should deny the applicant, there is a potential for <br /> funding loss. There is also the long term potential that the larger development loan, which is subject to <br /> cash flow, may not be repaid in full. <br /> Mr. Bocian discussed the MOU with Pleasanton Gardens, which memorializes the effort and intent to <br /> move forward cooperatively. Under the MOU, the city assumes all predevelopment and construction <br /> costs. Once the PUD and financing are approved, Pleasanton Gardens will enter into a separate <br /> agreement with the city to transfer its site and all improvements, including the Section 8 contract for 31 <br /> units and available financial reserves. The city, in return, agrees to house Pleasanton Gardens' <br /> residents in the new development through a process that gives them first priority to transfer into similar <br /> units. Under the MOU, the city also indicates its intention to have the development be smoke free. <br /> He reviewed the list of recommended action items, noting that by increasing the city's contribution to <br /> $10 million the Council will be appropriating that amount in Lower Income Housing Funds to a specific <br /> account reserved for the Kottinger Place project. <br /> Mayor Thorne stressed that the actions requested by staff relate more to establishing the city's role in <br /> the development partnership rather than a detailed review of the project itself. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 13 November 5, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.