My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
110513
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2013 11:49:14 AM
Creation date
10/31/2013 11:48:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/5/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
approximately 6.5 acres. No portion of the Kottinger Community Park will be used for <br /> the development, and the current parking capacity for the park will be retained. <br /> The project is proposed to include a total of 185 units in a configuration of single story <br /> cottage units, and two and three story multi-story buildings. Also, included are <br /> significant open spaces, community rooms on the Kottinger Place and Pleasanton <br /> Gardens sites, parking, improved pedestrian access across Kottinger Drive and space <br /> for resident gardens. A summary of the unit mix is as follows: <br /> Proposed Kottinger Gardens Unit Mix <br /> Building Unit EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT <br /> Type Type KP PG Total KP PG Total <br /> Studio 32 20 52 0 0 0 <br /> Cottage/ 1BR 16 19 35 57 24 81 <br /> 1-Story: 2BR 2 1 3 0 0 0 <br /> Total: 50 40 90 57 24 81 <br /> Studio 0 0 0 0 0 0 <br /> Multi- 1BR 0 0 0 69 26 95 <br /> Story: 2BR 0 0 0 5 4 9 <br /> Total: 0 0 0 74 30 104 <br /> TOTAL: 50 40 90 131 54 185 <br /> PUD Submittal <br /> As the Council is aware, work since October 2012 has been geared toward <br /> development of a site plan and general architectural design that meets the needs of <br /> current Kottinger Place and Pleasanton Gardens residents, future residents and the <br /> neighborhood. Based on responses to date, the Task Force is of the opinion that this <br /> goal has been realized, and it endorses moving forward to the City's PUD process. As <br /> indicated in the recommended DDA and previous City understandings with MidPen, <br /> staff anticipates a typical plan review process including staff review, Planning <br /> Commission and Housing Commission action and City Council review and approval. As <br /> such, some of the elements illustrated above and in Attachment A may be modified as <br /> the project works its way through the review process. <br /> Pending City Council authorization, MidPen is intending to submit its PUD application in <br /> December with the goal of completing the process in May 2014. <br /> In the event the City Council has concerns regarding the site plan or PUD plan <br /> submittal, staff requests direction so that it can work with the Task Force to address <br /> these matters. <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.