My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2013 4:06:56 PM
Creation date
10/15/2013 12:01:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(5) We would like to see an option where the Operations Service Center (OSC) is moved so the new <br /> development can be better blended with existing homes. <br /> (6) We hope that as our elected representatives, you will continue to fight to maintain local control in our City <br /> planning. We desire a pushback on RHNA and The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) and its <br /> One Bay Area decentralized planning. We don't want Pleasanton planned by planners in Oakland! <br /> We ask that land is not rezoned for housing until it is required (Do not rezone the planned 2022-2030 land at <br /> this time). At some point ABAG/RHNA may be deemed invalid as a result of lawsuits? <br /> (7) Moving forward we arc requesting to have a group of our residents meet individually with the City <br /> Council members to further discuss how we can decrease the impacts this will have on our community <br /> (such as decreasing infrastructure costs, other sites in Pleasanton to satisfy RHNA numbers, proposing a Bond, <br /> (8) Impact on schools. Although the future of schools are being management by Pleasanton Unified School <br /> District (PUSD), city council could have a big say on the impact by controlling the growth of our City, studying <br /> every new development being proposed, and determining the impact on our schools and quality of education. <br /> We have a concern that the current council pushing for jobs could result in even higher housing unit <br /> requirements in our already over-impacted city (note the recent article on Pleasanton Weekly indicating more <br /> jobs would mean additional housing requirement). If more jobs results in increased RFINA requirements, how <br /> do you balance the increase in revenue from these jobs to the decrease in property tax revenues as the <br /> Pleasanton housing loses equity if the new housing is not managed correctly? <br /> We appreciate your consideration of the above issues. Your actions and vision are essential to keep our <br /> Pleasanton beautiful so that our next generations will all be proud of!! <br /> Thank you. <br /> Sincerely yours, <br /> Click here to report this email as spam. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.