My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 08-11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 08-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:33:01 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:32:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
page 4 <br /> While staff has focused the Task Force's attention on accommodating RHNA numbers within <br /> the EPSP area, the Task Force should also consider the factors that generate housing need. <br /> Creating a plan for East Pleasanton that creates more housing need than it can mitigate on site <br /> has risks. <br /> For instance: <br /> Given Pleasanton's current jobs/housing imbalance, and the substantial resulting daily in- <br /> commute, a plan that creates more jobs than housing will make it impossible for Pleasanton to <br /> write a certifiable General Plan Air Quality Element. <br /> Pleasanton has limited land within the City's Urban Growth Boundary to designate for future <br /> workforce housing. Yet, as with the Housing Cap,the Urban Growth Boundary is vulnerable to <br /> invalidation if it prevents Pleasanton from meeting State mandated housing requirements. <br /> It makes little sense to create land use plans such as those represented in Options 1, 2, and 3, that <br /> will result in such a greatly increased demand for affordable housing while providing only a <br /> small percentage of what is needed. At this point Options will only benefit the property owners <br /> and their associated development interests. The Options presented fail to include elements to <br /> meet Pleasanton's interest in bringing jobs and housing into balance, and could eventually <br /> threaten the integrity of our UGB. <br /> Therefore, I request that the Task Force ask staff, property owners, and developers to create one <br /> or more alternatives that, at least, self mitigate the housing need generated and, if possible, <br /> contribute to the long term process of providing all the workforce housing needed to serve our <br /> thriving business community. <br /> Thank you for your consideration. <br /> Very sincerely, <br /> Becky Pe K.4.4y <br /> Citizens for a Caring Community <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.