My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:21:34 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> Ms. Stern explained that bearing that in mind and then making an assumption as to <br /> what the City's next RHNA numbers will look as shown in the sixth column, the number <br /> of units that the City needs to plan for adds up to over 2,800 and includes over 1,200 of <br /> the higher density of 30 units plus per acre and about 800 of the Moderate-Income or <br /> the 23-units-per-acre category. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired, for clarification, that the 2,800 units does not include <br /> the East Pleasanton numbers. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that was correct. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor further inquired if everything that the City has already zoned <br /> for is already included in that number, even if the projects have not yet been approved. <br /> Ms. Stern said yes and pointed to the third column as the existing inventory. She noted <br /> that those numbers include everything that has already been zoned. She further noted <br /> that this number was bigger a year and a half ago, and then the Auf der Maur and the <br /> Pleasanton Gateway projects were approved, plus the other projects that are already <br /> moving through the process; so this number, as it stands right now, could potentially be <br /> smaller as more projects are approved. <br /> Chair Pearce inquired if it matters that approved properties do not get built before 2014 <br /> and if they then do not go into the 2014-2022 planning period. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that once projects are approved and even if they are not built during <br /> that housing period, they are off the table unless they lose their approval, in which case <br /> the City can approve them again. <br /> Ms. Stern then presented the second table below which looks at how the Preferred Plan <br /> and the different Options meet some of those requirements that outlined in the first <br /> table. <br /> Plan Percent of 2014—2030 RHNA Need <br /> low/Very Low Moderate Above Moderate <br /> RHNA Need 1,213 Umts 810 Units 832 units <br /> 9refe^e1 375 urits/31% 241 unit/30% 1,143 units/132% <br /> 2I3r <br /> 1,759 uric <br /> OoUor 1 305 units/25% 195 anits/24% 500 units/60'4 <br /> 1.000 urns <br /> Oonos 4 393 nrms/33% 250 unsts/31% 641 runs/77% <br /> 1,253 urits <br /> Oa:.or 5A 510 o-its/42% 276 unit/34°% 973vv[b/112°; <br /> 1,759 unts <br /> __ <br /> Ootior SB 570 its/42% 299 units/37% 890 units/102°, <br /> units/ <br /> 1,759 uric <br /> Ooton 6 574urts/47% 383 units/47% 1,322 uniss/1593, <br /> 2,279 unit <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/25/2013 Page 9 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.