My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:21:34 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Any development in the East Pleasanton Specific Plan (EPSP) are would bear its own cost of <br /> infrastructure and not burden other portions of the city or City government; <br /> • Extension of El Charm Road would continue all the way from 1-580 South to Stanley Boulevard; <br /> • The plan may consider development beyond the current Urban Growth Boundary; <br /> • Relocation of Pleasanton Garbage Service and the City's Operations Sery ce Center is ideal if it <br /> can be accomplished in a cost neutral manner; <br /> • The plan shall include a public school site until such time as the schoo board completes its <br /> demographic studies and provides further direction; <br /> • Both Busch Road and Boulder Street will contain connections through to E Charro Road; <br /> • The plan should accommodate more than one cycle, ideally two cycles, of Regional Housing <br /> Needs Assessment(RHNA)numbers; <br /> • The main roadway system would be comprised of curvilinear streets as opposed to a rigid grid <br /> system <br /> In addition to the number of RHNA cycles to be accommodated by the plan, there was considerable <br /> discussion related to what percentage of these cycles should be accounted for in the planning area and <br /> what the appropriate mix of single family versus multi-family units would be. Mr. Dolan explained that <br /> approximately 400 of the 1,100 acres Is developable land. He also explained that the RHNA <br /> assignments contain a substantial number of units that must be developed at 33 units per acre and, <br /> while this acreage can accommodate that kind of density, there is the potential to build the area out <br /> such that it has a different character from the rest of town. The task force has therefore been very <br /> mindful of the Issue of balance and the town's current balance of 75%single family to 25%multi-family <br /> development. He noted that the recent rezoning and project approvals do Indicate a somewhat <br /> significant change from those numbers to 66%single family and 34%multi-family. <br /> The task force has also requested the Council's feedback about whether to concentrate the density <br /> around a community center or disperse it through to the edges of the planning area. While the task <br /> force currently prefers to disperse it, staff has been attempting to follow traditional urban design <br /> principles that place the greatest intensity in the center where community serving uses can be better <br /> concentrated. <br /> Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio said there has been some new thought about how to best locate density in <br /> urban design and asked and confirmed that staff had not conducted outreach to see what other <br /> alternatives might be viable. <br /> Mr. Dolan Introduced the 6 circulation and land use plan alternatives currently under consideration, <br /> noting that additional dialogue at the last task force meeting brought about the last 2 options. Staff is <br /> requesting the Council's feedback on these options so that the task force can narrow the list to 3 or 4 <br /> alternatives on which to focus further analysis. He noted key planning area constraints,which include <br /> 700 acres in and around the lake area that is not available for development,the existing Urban Growth <br /> Boundary that essentially runs in alignment with the anticipated extension of El Charro Road,the City <br /> limit, and Airport Protection Zone. In presenting the following alternatives, he noted that the purpose of <br /> the exercise is not to analyze the physical arrangement of land use patterns but rather to make sure the <br /> alternatives capture the full range of alternatives that could result In a well laid out community with the <br /> appropriate mix of units and density. <br /> Councilmember Brown noted that Cope Lake changes significantly in size from one map to another.Mr. <br /> Dolan clarified that the change relates only to water levels that may have been present at the time the <br /> map was prepared. He explained that regardless of its size or condition, the lake is entirely under the <br /> control of Zone 7 and is to be used for flood control and open space purposes, nol development <br /> Mayor Thome asked whether staff has looked at what phasing the extension of El Charro Road to <br /> Busch Road would mean to traffic at major intersections along Valley Avenue. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 13 June 10.2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.