My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:21:34 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that there is this sort of imaginary level of confidence in the work that is <br /> being done. <br /> Commissioner Allen stated that she hears what is being said and that she is fine with <br /> that as long as the notes also say that the assumption is it is covering the Transfer <br /> Station. She indicated that she gets really nervous when this discussion comes up <br /> about this number and then the Transfer Station is 80 or 90 on top of it. She stated that <br /> the last thing she want for the City and the community is to have two different sets of <br /> numbers so that it does not result in approving one and then another set of numbers <br /> has to be added when everyone knows that the plan that is being developed is for the <br /> entire East Pleasanton and the Transfer Station is part of that. She added that she <br /> wants to make sure the number covers it all. <br /> Commissioner Ritter noted that that is what is being proposed with this Preferred Plan, <br /> and parts of each of these Options can be extracted to cover everything. He asked why <br /> the Commission cannot approve what is being proposed. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that the reason he would like to do it that way is so that <br /> when the Commission gets all those pieces back and becomes the Preferred Plan, the <br /> Commission might have the option to reuse some of the units; or if one of these <br /> Preferred Plans came out and there was excess profitability or feasibility, the industrial <br /> site could potentially be eliminated. He indicated that he does not know what that <br /> profitability brings to the total, but it is outside the Urban Growth Boundary right now. <br /> He added that he would like to have that as an option when the Commission looks at <br /> what the feasibility of the whole Plan is. <br /> Chair Pearce stated that she thinks Mr. Dolan's suggestion makes a lot of sense and <br /> that she is much more comfortable doing that than adding another Option/Alternative to <br /> look at. She indicated that she sees where Commissioner O'Connor is going but she <br /> would rather go in this direction than add another Alternative now. <br /> Commissioner Allen stated that she is comfortable with that. <br /> Chair Pearce summarized that the Planning Commission is comfortable at this point <br /> with accepting the Task Force's Preferred Plan while adding another option with the <br /> 1,430 units. She asked the Commissioners if they are comfortable with that. <br /> Commissioners O'Connor and Allen said yes. <br /> Commissioner Posson asked Chair Pearce if she is saying the Preferred Plan plus the <br /> Alternative. <br /> Chair Pearce said yes. <br /> Commissioner Posson indicated that a number of Alternatives have already been <br /> identified. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/25/2013 Page 27 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.