My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENTS 02-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:21:34 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:21:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that staff anticipated that comment and actually has a previous <br /> Alternative, although with a twist on it, created tonight. He indicated that this was done <br /> back when staff was still working with a 50/50 single-family vs. multi-family. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that the Commission did talk at that Work Session <br /> about going as far as 65/35. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that was correct. He added that what he was saying is that staff <br /> grabbed this at the last minute because staff heard some rumblings about this desire <br /> today. He noted that staff did not adjust it to a different unit mix, and if the Commission <br /> wants a 1,430 staff needs to know if the Commission wants that done at 65/35 like the <br /> Task Force's ratio. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor replied that he thinks that in order to create the value, it needs <br /> to be at 65 percent; otherwise, it may not be financially feasibility. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that the only down side of including this at all is that it adds a little <br /> more to track and it is going to be a little more expensive and will add some cost to the <br /> EIR, which would be the property owner's burden. He indicated that staff is not <br /> opposed to including it and was something that was brought up at the Task Force. He <br /> explained that there used to be different Plans with equidistant steps, but one was taken <br /> out, and the Task Force members were ultimately fine with it because he convinced <br /> them that this number could be moved wherever they wanted as long as they have the <br /> high end covered, and they were satisfied with that. He acknowledged, even then, that <br /> it is more convenient to have the steps and so he is not opposed to putting it back in. <br /> Chair Pearce inquired if it is more convenient and more efficient because it is already in <br /> the EIR. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that if it turns out that this is what is approved, land the numbers do <br /> not need to be manipulated; but that is only in that one circumstance. <br /> Chair Pearce agreed with Mr. Dolan. <br /> Commissioner Allen agreed on the 65/35. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor asked if that is all staff needs from the Commission. <br /> Mr. Dolan replied that it would be great if the Commission supports its selection of the <br /> Preferred Plan, and it can be called whatever the Commission wants, and add the <br /> 1,430 Plan, and that would be one outcome that would be fine with staff. <br /> Commissioner Allen stated that that was a great suggestion and she supports adding <br /> the other Plan. She indicated that she would like to propose, if there is support for this, <br /> that the Preferred Plan be reduced slightly. She stated that at the last Task Force <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 9/25/2013 Page 25 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.