My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENT 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:44:04 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner O'Connor stated that what he finds interesting about this calculation is <br /> that even with the highest development, Alternative 3, which got most of the criticism at <br /> the last meeting, it would be off only by about less than 200 units, which is really not a <br /> lot of difference. He noted that all four Alternatives are pretty close in terms of what <br /> would need to be found in the rest of the City. <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that he understood Commissioner O'Connor's point. He explained that <br /> the average is approximately 250 per project, and in chunks of 250, the average would <br /> be somewhere around eight acres. He noted that these should be thought of in terms of <br /> how many of these projects are really going to be available. He questioned if, for <br /> example, one apartment is built on 400 acres of developable land, if it would be <br /> necessary to have that few to reflect the character of the rest of the town. He displayed <br /> the graphic that staff had prepared for the Housing Element Update that shows where <br /> multi-family is concentrated within the City, and replicating that character is not <br /> necessarily a mathematical equation. He noted that one can drive up the west side of <br /> the City for miles and not see any multi-family development; then driving up into <br /> Hacienda and around there, there is a little more, and there are some in the Downtown. <br /> He added that the experience varies quite a bit, depending on where one is in town to <br /> derive the character based on the type of housing. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that it is interesting that although there is nothing in the <br /> East area, it is still being studied. He further noted that there is not a lot that have been <br /> rezoned before that is even close to that area. <br /> Mr. Dolan noted that was correct. He indicated that there has been a fair amount of <br /> comment, and if the quadrant defined as EastNVest is split by Santa Rita Road and <br /> North/South is split by Stanley Boulevard, there is not a lot in there. He stated that it has <br /> been pointed out by Task Force members and even by a previous Councilmember that <br /> the Auf der Maur site, which will be coming before the Commission in the near future, is <br /> pretty close; and then the Irby property will come forward in the next round and rates <br /> very highly for consideration, which is not too far away either. <br /> Mr. Dolan emphasized that his point remains that the East Pleasanton Specific Plan <br /> area is the only wide-open space that the City has left. He indicated that Commissioner <br /> O'Connor's point that the differences are not that much is a good one; however, it is <br /> something that the City needs to be sensitive to when considering how many apartment <br /> projects of this size can be put out there and still maintain the character so it still feels <br /> like the rest of Pleasanton. He reiterated that he just wants the Commission to have <br /> another chance to absorb that information and see if there was anything else it wanted <br /> to share with the Council. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that something that came up quite a bit at the last <br /> meeting was that the Commission realized that it will be necessary to come back to the <br /> entire City, but it does not want to necessarily have to come back to the East side after <br /> it has been planned. He added that the Commission was thinking that when all the rest <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 12, 2013 Page 4 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.