My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENT 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:44:04 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Rasmussen said yes; there would be public parks and private open space. He <br /> added that in this case, the entryway and detention basin would be a major buffer and a <br /> private play area essentially to keep residential development away from the Transfer <br /> Station. He added that the spine discussed earlier would be private and access <br /> horizontally over toward Cope Lake for the drainage swales would also be private. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor stated that he is in favor of everything Mr. Rasmussen <br /> described. <br /> Commissioner Posson inquired if an HOA would have to be developed for private parks <br /> that would be just for the residents. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen said yes. <br /> Commissioner Olson agreed and stated that he is captivated with Commission <br /> O'Connor's great idea to put some higher-density in position to have a view of the lake. <br /> He added that he does not have any issue with that major park east of El Charro Road. <br /> Chair Blank agreed that it is a great idea but added that the only problem with this is <br /> that it puts the higher-density right up against the neighborhood because of the APA, <br /> which is restrictive in terms of what can be done there. He added that he likes the <br /> parks. <br /> Commissioner Pearce agreed, especially with an active park, given the real limited use <br /> of what can be done with the lakes. <br /> Commissioner Olson added that a park for dogs would be great. <br /> 6. Comment on extending Boulder Street into or through the EPSP area to <br /> reduce traffic on Busch Road. <br /> Chair Blank asked Mr. Rasmussen what staff is looking for here. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen replied that this is sort of a check-in type question as well, as far as a <br /> way to get traffic out of and into the Specific Plan area from the west without having to <br /> put it all on Busch Road. He indicated that this discussion really had not taken place to <br /> any significant extent until the Specific Plan process started up and, therefore, may be <br /> something new to some of the Commissioners. <br /> Chair Blank requested Mr. Rasmussen to put up the slide showing the Boulder Street <br /> extension. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen replied that Boulder Street is a new road and does not have major plan <br /> implications. He stated that there are several different plans: on one of the plans, it <br /> extends right down and connects to Busch Road, and another, it goes all the way <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 25 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.