My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENT 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:44:04 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
heads in the sand, ignoring this serious condition. She stated that she will give staff, <br /> and ask staff to provide a copy to the Commission, a list of all the documents and all the <br /> sites for all of the information on every school site size, land size, and current capacity. <br /> She added that the reason the District is not asking to build another school is because it <br /> has gotten itself into a $28,000,000 facility debt, and so as many houses are built, <br /> overburdening existing campuses will continue, resulting in negatively affecting the <br /> quality of life, not only at the campuses but throughout the community. <br /> Chair Blank stated that he has personally known the next speaker, Sherry Barclay, for <br /> many, many years and that they have not discussed this matter. He added that he did <br /> not know that Ms. Barclay was going to be at the meeting this evening. <br /> Sherry Barclay stated that what brought her here this evening is that she has also been <br /> attending some of the Task Force meetings and is concerned about the same thing that <br /> the other people have mentioned: the volume of housing intended to be put in this <br /> particular area. She stated that she lives in the Ironwood Village, the 55-and-older <br /> community that is still being completed, and previous to that, she lived in the Martin <br /> Avenue neighborhood for 22 years, so she is very familiar with that side of town. She <br /> indicated that what is being proposed here does not fit anything that goes over in that <br /> end of the town. She added that that other thing that was really surprising is that, for as <br /> long as she has lived here, Valley Avenue has one of the major traffic problems in this <br /> town, and yet a big multi-unit project has already been approved on the south side of <br /> Stanley Boulevard, and now another 1,000 to 1,700 housing units are being added, all <br /> coming out through Busch Road onto Valley Avenue and putting a lot more traffic in that <br /> area. She stated that her biggest concern is that she just thinks these numbers are way <br /> out of proportion for either the Valley Avenue, Stanley Boulevard, or her neighborhood, <br /> in general. She added that it goes without saying that the problem with the schools has <br /> been there for a long time. <br /> Sean Sowell stated that from a work-force affordable-housing point of view, he would <br /> like to ask that the Planning Commission look at Alternative 3 most closely because he <br /> thinks this one does really the best job of including more people in the community who <br /> have been excluded from the community due to the high cost of housing here in town. <br /> He stated that he already lives in Pleasanton and that his son already goes to school <br /> here and will start high school in the fall. He indicated that work force housing and <br /> moderately-priced housing for people in the community is a good thing, and he thinks <br /> Alternative 3 probably does the job best, although he is not sure that the particular <br /> sprinkling of the lower- versus the medium- and higher-density units is really the best <br /> way to do it. <br /> Mr. Sowell stated that in regard to this Alternative, he would like the Planning <br /> Commission to suggest to the Task Force to set aside a portion of the parcel to the <br /> north reserved for retail/office for some housing so the burden of housing is not <br /> restricted entirely on that southern portion of the plan area. He added that at the <br /> Housing Commission meeting a few weeks back, he had asked the Commission to look <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 15 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.