My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11 ATTACHMENT 01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:44:04 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stern replied that the density in Ironwood varies among the active community, the <br /> classics, the apartments, and so on, but the density of the single-family residential is <br /> probably around that density. <br /> Commissioner Posson inquired if the multi-family is about the same as well. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen replied that the active seniors are probably eight units per acre. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired if the current mix of single-family versus all other <br /> higher density in the City is about 25 percent to 75 percent or something like that. <br /> Ms. Stern replied that the current mix is about 25-percent multi-family, including units <br /> and structures of five or more units, with the rest being single-family. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that all four Alternatives are higher in density, with <br /> Alternative 1 being the lowest, but still higher than the current mix. He inquired if it was <br /> around 35 percent or 40 percent. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen confirmed that all the Alternatives are higher than the current mix. He <br /> noted that one of the primary questions that has come out of the Task Force process is <br /> whether the East Pleasanton neighborhood is being developed to be just like the rest of <br /> town or if this one major planning area is being used to accommodate the City's future <br /> RHNA assignments. <br /> Ms. Stern stated that most of the Alternatives are about 50 percent. She added that it <br /> would also depend on whether or not the moderate are also counted. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor inquired what the next step would be if more single-family <br /> were added to Alternative 1 to arrive at a 25-percent to 75-percent split, and the City <br /> gets RHNA numbers that are higher than what the City currently has zoned for. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen replied that the City will have to find sites for whatever RHNA numbers <br /> are left over, noting that even at 50 percent, the City would have more sites than what it <br /> had at the last Housing Element Update. <br /> Commissioner O'Connor noted that it could involve rezoning within East Pleasanton as <br /> well as the rest of the City and inquired if staff is looking at rezoning or upzoning. <br /> Mr. Rasmussen replied that it had never occurred to him to come back and upzone in <br /> East Pleasanton after the plan is completed. He added that staff would be comparing <br /> that option against other options out in the existing neighborhoods. <br /> Chair Blank stated that he recalls the conversations the Commission had about creating <br /> an area where there is nothing but high-density housing and the cautions the <br /> Commission received about putting all the high-density housing in one area when it was <br /> trying to figure out how to spread this throughout the City. <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 22, 2013 Page 11 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.