My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
101513
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 4:14:24 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 4:14:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/15/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
indicates that a reduced plan is financially feasible. The additional alternative <br /> recommended by the Planning Commission is included in Attachment 1 as Alternative 8. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> Attachment 1 provides text descriptions, maps, and acreages, and quantifies the <br /> development in the Preferred Plan and the six Alternatives. The plans represent a range <br /> of alternatives with residential units ranging from 1,000 units to 2,279 units, and plans <br /> representing various proportions of single family and multifamily development. Retail and <br /> office development is similar in the preferred plan and all alternatives (at 91,000 square <br /> feet and 442,000 square feet, respectively) and industrial development varies from 1.06 <br /> million to 2.17 million square feet. A summary of the development program for each <br /> alternative is included on the last page of Attachment 1. <br /> Preferred Plan: <br /> The Preferred Plan evolved over several Task Force meetings which focused on the <br /> following questions: <br /> • What is the appropriate level of development given a desire to create a financially <br /> feasible plan? <br /> • How many residential units should be accommodated and what should be the <br /> balance between single family homes and multifamily units? <br /> • Should the multifamily units and other higher density development be focused in a <br /> central area to create an "activity center" or should the higher density development <br /> be dispersed? <br /> • Should the Operations Services Center (OSC) and/or Pleasanton Garbage <br /> Service (PGS) facility be relocated? <br /> The Preferred Plan would result in the following development: <br /> SF-R SF-R SF-R MF-R MF-R Total <br /> 4d/a 8d/a 11d/a 23d/a 30d/a Housing <br /> 183 units 664 units 296 units 241 units 375 units 1,759 units <br /> 46 acres 83 acres 27 acres 10 acres 13 acres 179 acres <br /> Retail Campus Industrial/ Destination Public & <br /> Office Flex Use Institutional <br /> 91,000 sq.ft. 442,000 sq.ft. 1,057,000 sq.ft. 3 acres 17 acres <br /> Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.