My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
091713
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2013 12:20:03 PM
Creation date
9/16/2013 1:28:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
page 2 <br /> Very Low and Extremely Low Income (<50%AMI} <br /> Units affordable at<49% AMI: 0 approved <br /> Units affordable at 50%AMI: 147 approved <br /> 1,076 needed for 0-50% per RHNA. 14% of total need approved <br /> Low Income (51-80% AMI) <br /> Units affordable at 51-59% AMI: 0 approved <br /> Units affordable at 60% AMI:16 approved <br /> Units affordable at 61-79% AMI: 0 approved <br /> Units affordable at 80%AMI: 16 approved <br /> 1,599 needed per RHNA. 3.4% of total need approved. <br /> Moderate Income (80-120% AMI) <br /> Units affordable at 81-99% AMI: 0 approved <br /> Units affordable at 100% AMI:16 approved <br /> Units affordable at 81-120% AMI: 1,333 approved/ <br /> 720 needed per RHNA. 185% of total need approved. <br /> Building 900,000 square feet of Commercial and office will generate, according to Pleasanton's Land Use Element, an <br /> additional 3000 employees. At 1.69 employees per household (see Pleasanton's Draft Nexus Study)these 3000 <br /> employees will generate a need for 1,775 units of housing. Analysis using the formula in the Draft Nexus Study, show that <br /> over 50%, or 908 units will be needed for households earning the median income or below. <br /> While Hacienda has recently approved a great deal of residential housing, the number of combined BMR units approved <br /> falls short of the number needed to mitigate even the impact for BMR units created by the market rate rental units (when <br /> calculated using the metrics of our Draft Nexus Study). In terms of the RHNA identified need,the number falls shorter still. <br /> Our current method for providing the affordable units we need is only generating more need, additional commute traffic, <br /> and increased air pollution. Pleasanton needs to develop a better system that allows Hacienda and other commercial <br /> property owners to mitigate these impacts before the Council permits commercial entitlements to be transferred from one <br /> property to another. <br /> Failing to consider housing need impacts of all development,just as we consider traffic, water, and sewer impacts, could <br /> have serious consequences. We are already seeing pressure on our Urban Growth Boundary in the East Pleasanton <br /> Specific Plan process. Transfer of Hacienda's commercial development entitlements could be the best idea since the <br /> incorporation of Pleasanton, but not until we figure out the housing puzzle. Please postpone the decision until that time so <br /> we can find the best way to meet Hacienda's needs without sacrificing our quality of life elsewhere in the City. <br /> Very sincerely, /� <br /> 12Ckti Celf IJ } <br /> Citizens for a Caring Community <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.