My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
091713
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2013 12:22:30 PM
Creation date
9/12/2013 4:44:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/17/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
or safety problem, cause an environmental problem, harm historical property, or would <br />be contrary to law. <br />The number of incentives or concessions a project may request is summarized in the <br />table below: <br />Incentives /Concessions Summary <br />Target Group for Density Bonus <br />Target Units <br />Very Low Income <br />5% <br />10% <br />15% <br />Low Income <br />10% <br />20% <br />30% <br />Moderate Income (Common interest development, Condo <br />or PUD only) <br />10% <br />20% <br />30% <br />Maximum Number of Incentive(s) /Concession(s) <br />1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />Using the same example above, the developer proposes to provide 10 percent of the <br />units as affordable to very low income households and therefore would be entitled to <br />two incentives /concessions. <br />The City may require that developers provide a detailed financial report showing how a <br />proposed incentive or concession is required in order to achieve the affordable housing <br />costs or rents. Also, certain incentives or concessions may be identified by the City as <br />preferred incentives or concessions that would require no financial report. For this <br />purpose, the ordinance proposed two groups of incentives and concessions. Group one <br />includes concessions and incentives that are preferred, and that the City recognizes as <br />resulting in a financially sufficient cost reduction to the project. They would be available <br />without need for the developer to provide a financial report demonstrating that the cost <br />reduction is sufficient. This group includes a 20 percent reduction in one of the required <br />setbacks and a 10 percent reduction in minimum lot size and /or dimension. Each of <br />these two items would be counted as one incentive or concession. <br />The second group of incentives /concessions would require a detailed financial report to <br />demonstrate that the incentives or concessions "would result in necessary identifiable, <br />financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions that could not be achieved without the <br />incentive or concession ". This is a broader group of incentives /concessions that <br />includes those that exceed the incentives /concessions identified in group one, e.g., <br />approval of mixed -use zoning in conjunction with the housing development, construction <br />of target units on a different site than the proposed development, fee waivers or <br />deferrals, and other regulatory incentives or concessions that may be identified by the <br />developer. <br />In addition to the incentives and concessions described above, should a developer <br />identify other development standards that financially preclude the construction of a <br />housing development, with the density bonus and incentives or concessions allowed, <br />Case No. P13 -2102, City of Pleasanton Planning Commission <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.