12 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT Mr. Dolan stated that the second reason is that the required RHNA housing must go somewhere, and if it does not go into Hacienda, it will go somewhere else throughout the City. He noted that in some ways, if it goes elsewhere, the City will get the housing and the office anyway; however, the City thinks that Hacienda is the right location to put both, as envisioned in the General Plan. Mr. Dolan continued that the third reason for staff's support of this change, which is very important, is that the Housing Element EIR documents evaluated a large amount of development. He indicated that basically, this scenario where the office number is not reduced but residential is added on top of it works in all infrastructure areas and, most importantly to most people, in traffic. He noted that staff has done the analysis and traffic should not be a concern as the circulation system works, and the total number of trips is well beyond what this action would allow. Mr. Dolan stated that the fourth reason is that Hacienda needs the additional square footage to remain competitive as the City moves forward. He noted that there is competition for new projects as parks are constantly evolving, changing, and adjusting to the new marketplace. He indicated that expansion of the opportunity in Hacienda is important to remain competitive, and he believes the Commission may hear a little bit more about that this evening from others. He stated that all other limitations on development in Hacienda will remain in effect; it does not change the site development standards that have been adopted for the housing sites or the site development standards that apply to commercial development. He added that the uses are not changed, and the FAR restrictions on a site -by -site basis are not affected by this change; it is just the total amount of development that changes. Mr. Dolan stated that the last reason is a narrow issue but is something that the Commission needs to understand. He indicated that the California Center project that has already been approved cannot move forward unless it is expressly exempted from the current cap. He explained that Hacienda reviews development projects proposed in the Park before they come to the City for consideration. He stated that when the owners of the California Center site volunteered a number of years ago to become a housing site, they asked Hacienda if they could pursue this additional entitlement, and Hacienda said yes, but only if they were not affecting the cap. He noted that staff encouraged California Center to move forward because it was the highest ranked housing site on the list; however, the project can move forward only if these clarifications being considered tonight are approved. Mr. Dolan concluded that that is essentially the issue here. He stated that there is a lot more detail staff could go into if the Commission is interested. He noted that there were some emails back and forth between staff and Commissioner Allen, copies of which were given to the Commissions. He indicated that some of the emails had very specific questions, a lot were mathematical, and staff tried to answer those and share with everybody. He stated that a lot of the tracking has to do with traffic, and the staff person DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 8/28/2013 Page 3 of 11