Laserfiche WebLink
In addition to the IZO, the City's Housing Site Standards and Design Guidelines (Design <br /> Guidelines) stipulate that 10% of the affordable units will be 3-bedroom units and 35% will <br /> be 2-bedroom units. As proposed, the development exceeds the 2-bedroom requirement <br /> but falls short of the 3-bedroom requirement by approximately two units. In assessing this <br /> situation, staff considered the fact that the proposed project includes a large number of <br /> affordable one-bedroom units rather than studio units, which have beer included in other <br /> developments; that the one affordable 3-bedroom unit is at 50% AMI; and that overall, the <br /> 16 very low income units proposed for this development exceed the number of units <br /> provided in the California Center and Auf der Maur developments as an overriding <br /> consideration. Finally, the number of two- and three-bedroom units equals the 45% <br /> requirement of the Design Guidelines. As a result, staff determined that the project meets <br /> the intent of the Design Guidelines. <br /> Overall, staff's opinion it that the draft AHA is consistent with the IZO, that is meets the <br /> intend of the Design Guidelines, and that it provides the type of flexibility the City Council <br /> requested as part of the joint workshop with the Housing Commission. As indicated <br /> previously, the AHA was approved unanimously by the Housing Comm ssion. Note that <br /> the basic terms of affordability and reference to the AHA are part of the proposed <br /> development agreement. <br /> Growth Management Agreement <br /> The applicant requests a growth management allocation for all 307 unitE, in 2014. As the <br /> applicant's units would be used to meet the RHNA for the current cycle, the applicant's <br /> growth management request is consistent with the Growth Management Ordinance. The <br /> growth management allocations for the project are included in the proposed development <br /> agreement and would be extended into the future for the term of The development <br /> agreement. <br /> Miscellaneous Discussion Items <br /> Refer to Attachment 8, Planning Commission staff report, for a complete discussion of <br /> the following sub-sections of the staff report: "Climate Action Plan" (p. 38), <br /> "Pleasanton General Plan" (pp. 11-12), "Grading and Urban Storm Water Runoff" <br /> (pp. 39-40), "Green Building"(pp. 38-39), and "Landscaping"(pp. 21.-23). <br /> PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS <br /> The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit Development <br /> (PUD) District and the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD development <br /> plan proposal. The City Council must make the findings stated in that attached Planning <br /> Commission staff report before taking action. <br /> PUBLIC NOTICE <br /> Public notices were sent to the property owners, business owners, and business tenants <br /> within a 1,000-foot radius for the property and to residents in portions of :he Laguna Oaks <br /> development and the Bernal Specific Plan area. Exhibit K is the noticing area for the <br /> proposal. Staff has not received any additional written public comment since the <br /> Planning Commission public hearing. <br /> Page 16 of 19 <br />