Laserfiche WebLink
18. Reviewed the Legislative Advocacy Monitoring <br /> Assistant City Manager Lara gave a slide presentation of the staff report. She explained that this is an <br /> informational item which pertains to the Council's request that staff develop a process for monitoring <br /> state and regional legislative items. She outlined the existing process, prov ded suggestions for <br /> additional processes and gave a brief summary of key legislative items and positions. <br /> Ms. Lara outlined the federal agenda, which is developed annually as part of a regional effort with the <br /> Tri-Valley Mayors. This effort begins each fall and concludes based on the schedule of Congress and <br /> various federal agencies. The state legislative process typically begins in January and slows by <br /> October. Much of the information used by the Tri-Valley mayors comes from the League of California <br /> Cities, National League of Cities and regional agencies. When responding to legislation, the following <br /> guiding principles are taken into consideration: local control as it pertains to Pleasanton and the Tri- <br /> Valley region, financial security, land use planning, and public safety. The current practice is to respond <br /> to issues by drafting letters of support or opposition from the Mayor or Tri-Valley Mayors, copies of <br /> which are provided to the Council members of affected agencies. At times, Councilmembers or other <br /> elected officials are also asked to make phone calls to state lawmakers. <br /> In response to the Council's recently adoption priorities, staff is recommending the formation of a <br /> subcommittee for 2014. The subcommittee would work to identify legislative inte-ests and share them <br /> with the City Council. Staff anticipates that this will result in greater transparency and legislative <br /> monitoring, allow staff to respond to legislation on behalf of the Council, and develop a reporting <br /> process for the Council on an as needed basis. <br /> Ms. Lara provided a brief overview of recent legislative action and referred to the staff report for a full <br /> summary. <br /> • AB 210, Transactions and Use Taxes: County of Alameda and County 01 Contra Costa — This <br /> bill would extend the existing authority of the County of Alameda and authorize Contra Costa <br /> County to impose a transaction and use tax for county-wide transportation programs through <br /> December 31, 2020. Letter of support issued; <br /> • AB 325, Housing Element Litigation Four Year Statute of Limitations — This bill extends the <br /> statute of limitations to sue a city or county over the adoption of a self-certified Housing <br /> Element, Density Bonus Ordinance, least cost zoning law, growth limitation ordinance, or <br /> anything else related to implementation of a Housing Element or decisions on affordable <br /> housing projects from 1 to 4 years. Letter of opposition issued; <br /> • SB 7, Public Works: Charter Cities — Prohibits charter cities from using s:ate funds or financial <br /> assistance for all construction projects if the city has a charter provision or ordinance authorizing <br /> a contractor's noncompliance with state prevailing wage requirements on any public works <br /> contract funded by city funds. Letter of opposition issued; <br /> • AB 5, Homelessness — The now dead bill proposed to create a homeless person's bill of rights <br /> that would provide certain protections, including requiring counties to pay the cost of providing <br /> legal counsel and specific reporting requirements to the Attorney General's office on an annual <br /> basis. Letter of opposition issued; <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 13 July 16, 2013 <br />