My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
080613
>
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
>
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2013 12:34:49 PM
Creation date
8/5/2013 4:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/6/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Karen Diaz <br /> Subject: FW: Major apartment project for Bernal-Stanley goes to Pleasantor Council Aug. 6 <br /> Attachments: PUD-87.pdf <br /> From: Mark Priscaro <br /> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 1:43 PM <br /> To: Mayor and City Council; Mike Tassano <br /> Cc: Karen Diaz <br /> Subject: Re: Major apartment project for Bernal-Stanley goes to Pleasanton Council Aug. 6 <br /> Thanks for providing me with the traffic impact analysis report (attached) for PUD-87. <br /> Upon review,as I suspected,I believe this report is seriously flawed and lacking crucial information. <br /> It does not provide any data/analysis of the impact/increase in southbound and northbound traffic on Bernal Avenue between Valley/Stanley <br /> and Sunol Blvd.,nor does it provide any data/analysis of the impact/increase in eastbound and westbound traf is on Stanley/First Street <br /> between Valley/Bemal and Sunol Blvd. <br /> The authors of the study apparently are either unaware of or overlooked the already heavy traffic flows on the:+e two traffic corridors,both of <br /> which will most certainly see increased congestion from the additional traffic that will be generated from this passive housing project that <br /> will be heading to and from 1-680 via the Sunol Blvd. on and off ramps. <br /> Why wasn't that considered and researched?Why didn't anyone on the Planning Commission inquire about it Why didn't the City Traffic <br /> Engineering department request that it be researched? <br /> Additionally,even the immediate intersections(those closest to the proposed project)have LOS ratings of E cr F,which are terrible. <br /> That said,any so-called "fast track"approval of this massive housing project should be withheld until a more horough study of traffic <br /> impacts is conducted,reviewed,and the results considered. <br /> Mark Priscaro <br /> From: Mark Priscaro < <br /> To: "kdiaz[a@ci.pleasanton.ca.us" <kdiaz@ci.pleasanton.ca.us>; "mtassano ci.pleasanton.ca.us" <br /> <mtassano @ci.pleasanton.ca.us> <br /> Cc: City Council <citvcouncil(a)citvofpleasantonca.gov> <br /> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 11:47 AM <br /> Subject: Re: Major apartment project for Bernal-Stanley goes to Pleasanton Council Aug. 6 <br /> To Whom It May Concern: <br /> Can you please forward/share any traffic engineering study/ies that have been done regarding this proposed housing development prior to <br /> next Tuesday's Council Meeting? If none have been done,please advise. <br /> Also,if an EIR was completed that includes a traffic analysis,can you please forward that as well? <br /> Specifically, I'm referring to the PUD detailed recently in the Pleasanton Weekly: <br /> Major apartment project for Bernal-Stanley goes to Pleasanton Council Aug. 6 <br /> L.A. developer planning retail center, 345 upscale units in multi-story buildings <br /> http://www.pleasantonweekly.com/news/show story.php?id= 11663 <br /> All I've seen/heard re:traffic(from the article published) is: <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.