My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
071613
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2013 11:25:44 AM
Creation date
7/9/2013 4:40:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/16/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
staff at the proposed changes. He stated support for the flow chart with exception of the fact that it fails <br /> to identify the "can of worms" opened by the noticing process and subsequent public hearings. He <br /> noted that he submitted a signed petition opposing the proposed changes to the City Clerk. <br /> Brad Hirst said that historic preservation benefits the community, businesses and the downtown. <br /> Having said that, increased regulations stifle innovation and improvement, which is not good for the <br /> downtown. He recommended that the Council stop the process here and recommend only an update to <br /> existing guidelines. He questioned the values of any Council that would support a $100,000 <br /> expenditure on yet another consultant when City staff is more than capable of preparing the appropriate <br /> survey. He also questioned the efficacy of a historic district that excludes Main Street and commercial <br /> properties. He said the people of Pleasanton want to maintain and improve its historic inventory and <br /> private property owners, not the government, are better suited to determine what is best for their <br /> property. <br /> Rob Dondaro said he is under contract to purchase a home in the proposed historic district and is <br /> frightened by what some of the task force's recommendations could mean for him. He said he had <br /> considerable confidence in the ability of staff, existing regulations and the community to preserve the <br /> eclectic character of this area and that he strongly opposed any historic designation. <br /> Christine Bourg said she has invested considerable time and money in updating her 100+ year old <br /> Victorian on 2n Street. She asked the Council to support option 4 as it would truly protect Pleasanton's <br /> historic residential neighborhoods where existing regulations have not. She said that many comment on <br /> how much more vibrant Livermore's downtown is and that this is in large part due to their robust historic <br /> preservation policies as well as the addition of a City Historian and Heritage Commission. She noted <br /> that this task force is not recommending ordinances, historians or additional conditions but is <br /> recommending steps to protect the City's pieces of history for future generations. She also noted that <br /> recommendations were made in 2001 regarding the formation of historic preservation guidelines and, <br /> had these been implemented the City would likely not have lost the many historic homes that have <br /> been effectively demolished since then. <br /> Becky Duret stated her support for the creation of a formal historic district, which she thought would <br /> serve to streamline rather than complicate matters. She said that owning an older home comes with <br /> both privileges and responsibilities that are not for everyone. She shared her experiences remodeling <br /> her own 2nd Street home and said she, like many others, would have welcomed the assistance of <br /> historic guidelines. <br /> Debbie Ayres said she would like to see a designated historic district in Pleasanton. <br /> David Stark, Bay East Association of Realtors, said he has participated actively in the task force <br /> meetings. He said he felt the City's existing documents and policies deserve a comprehensive review in <br /> order to address the concerns raised this evening and provide a sense of certainty regardless of what <br /> direction that takes. He urged the Council to look at the potential unintended consequences that <br /> additional regulations could have on other City policies, specifically those related to the Climate Action <br /> Plan, and ensure that any historic guidelines do not preclude homeowners from modernizing their <br /> historic homes for the purpose of increased efficiency or comfort. As a homeowner, he has made a <br /> number of improvements to his mid century modern home not because of an ordinance, but because of <br /> his pride of ownership and own personal taste. He asked that any action of the Council reflect the <br /> integrity of the community and the fact that it has dynamic neighborhoods filled with engaged property <br /> owners. <br /> Sharrell Michelotti agreed with those who spoke against the need for additional regulations and in <br /> support of reviewing and clarifying existing documents. She encouraged the Council not to further <br /> complicate a process with additional regulations when the actual intent is to streamline it. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 9 of 16 June 4, 2013 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.