23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Table 3: Mix of Single Family and Multifamily Units and Comparison to RHNA Total Number of Number of Number Number 25 % Number of Units Single Multi- of of Multifamily multifamily Family family Single Multi- as a units Units in Units in Family family Percent of which Alternative Alternative at 75% at 25% estimated would RHNA for need to be Very-low, located Low and elsewhere Moderate in City Alternative 1,000 500 500 750 250 12% 1,773 1 Alternative 1,426 465 961 1,070 357 18% 1,666 2 Alternative 1,710 486 1,224 1,283 428 21% 1,595 3 Alternative 1,283 641 643 962 321 16% 1,702 4 2. Should the multifamily housing be located such that it contributes to a vibrant "community center", i.e. located centrally near the retail area or park, or be disbursed more to the edges of the Specific Plan area? Traditional planning rules would focus higher residential densities near where community activity is desired. However, some Task Force members wished to de-emphasize the larger multi- family structures by placing them on the edges of the planning area. 3. Selection of up to four Alternatives to be subiect of detailed impact and feasibility analysis. Staff recommends that the alternatives selected include the plan with the most development that can be considered, so that future CEQA analysis includes all potential impacts; staff also recommends that an alternative which retains the PGS facility in its existing location be analyzed. Staff is seeking City Council direction on the range of alternatives to be analyzed. NEXT STEPS The next steps in the EPSP process, following review of alternative plans by the Council, are scheduled to consist of the following: • Technical analysis by City staff and consultants of up to four working draft alternative plans. This will be used to help guide the preparation of the "preferred plan," and refinement of alternatives for inclusion in the EIR. These studies will include: (1) traffic impact assessment; (2) preliminary engineering, utility, infrastructure and water supply report; (3) preliminary road system engineering; (4) fiscal impact analysis; and (5) financial feasibility analysis. Some of this work has already been developed for previous steps of the EPSP process. Completion date: July 26, 2013. Page 8 of 9