My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
061813
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2013 4:41:14 PM
Creation date
6/13/2013 11:22:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/18/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
total approximately $60 million. The project feasibility analysis assumes that the <br /> proposed residential and commercial development in East Pleasanton will cover <br /> the cost burden of these improvements. Under these circumstances, the <br /> alternatives which include more development, particularly more residential <br /> development, will be those which are more likely to be economically feasible. By <br /> the same token, if the City were to share the cost of infrastructure, the economic <br /> feasibility of a smaller project alternative would be increased. <br /> 2. El Charro Road will be extended from its current terminus lust south of 1-580 and <br /> will connect to Stanley Boulevard as shown in the General Plan. Infrastructure <br /> costs would be significantly reduced if El Charro Road terminated at Busch Road. <br /> However, this configuration of El Charro Road is not likely to result in relief of <br /> traffic congestion on Valley Avenue and Santa Rita Road as anticipated in the <br /> General Plan. <br /> 3. Development beyond the existing Urban Growth Boundary is contemplated in all <br /> the plan alternatives. Program 22.6 of the General Plan Land Use Element <br /> contemplated reevaluation of the Urban Growth Boundary in East Pleasanton at <br /> such time as a plan for the future of reclaimed quarry land is considered. Whether <br /> or not such an adjustment to the UGB will require a vote of the people will be <br /> determined by the City Council. <br /> 4. Relocation of the City's Operation Services Center and the Pleasanton Garbage <br /> Service Transfer Station although desirable shall be cost neutral to the City and to <br /> PGS ratepayers. The existing location of the PGS facility (more so than the OSC) <br /> is a severe constraint to future residential development. Relocation of both <br /> facilities is shown in several of the alternatives. Although staff is aware that <br /> property owners have talked to the owners of PGS, no agreement regarding <br /> relocation has been reached at this time. <br /> 5. Plans should accommodate a public elementary school site adiacent to a public <br /> park. Alternative 5 shows the school site on the Operations Services Center; <br /> Other alternatives show the school on private property. <br /> 6. Boulder Street should be extended to Busch Road and/or El Charro to help <br /> disburse traffic on the larger street network. Extending Boulder Street would help <br /> reduce the traffic on Busch Road. <br /> 7. The East Pleasanton Specific Plan should accommodate a portion of the housing <br /> need for the next two RHNA cycles. Planning staff will soon starting working on <br /> the City's next Housing Element update for the 2014 to 2022 planning period. The <br /> next Housing Element planning period after that runs from 2022 to 2030. The City <br /> will need to find sites to accommodate the housing need for both of these updates <br /> (see more details regarding the City's Regional Housing Need Allocation numbers <br /> on p. 7 of this agenda report). As East Pleasanton is one of the few vacant, <br /> developable areas in the City and will be building out over a period of several <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.