My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
060413
>
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2015 2:40:52 PM
Creation date
6/3/2013 12:15:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/4/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SJEPIPA. ThL aagf iIa <br />Provided tr.) the City Council <br />,After Distribution of Packet <br />Date <br />Natalie Amos, Associate Planner <br />Pleasanton Planning Commission <br />200 Old Bernal Road <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 -0802 <br />6600 Kings Crown East <br />San Antonio, TX 78233 <br />June 2, 2013 <br />Dear Natalie, <br />We received the first notice of PUD- 84 -07M entitled Tranquil Message Center Application on April 30, <br />2013. We called by telephone on May 1, 2013 and left a message in which we requested an opportunity <br />to discuss the application. We appreciate your return call on or about May 3, 2013 in which you <br />answered our many questions and some of our concerns. <br />On May 27, 2013 we received the notice of the City Council's hearing on PUD- 84- 04 -07M on June 4, <br />2013. We were finally able to access the staff report on this application on June 1, 2013. We live in our <br />town home part time and when we are there we frequently observe activity in the Meadow Plaza <br />Shopping Center from our home located directly across Santa Rita Road. <br />We have the following comments: <br />We express concern regarding the impact of the proposed petition on children that frequent the area <br />both while walking to and from school and while visiting the family oriented food establishments in <br />adjacent space in the Meadow Plaza Center. Children are likely to be in the area more frequently when <br />the food market is operational. It is true that the school is about the same straight line distance from the <br />petitioner's old and new locations. However, the school entrance is much closer to the new location. <br />The path some students take on the way to and from the school is through the parkin;; lot of the <br />shopping center. The old location is on the west side of the Santa Road away from the housing area <br />while the new location is in the heart of a housing area on the east side of Santa Rita Road. <br />An additional concern is the potential impact of the business on traffic. The revitalization of the <br />shopping center will have a major impact on access to Santa Rita Road. The existing residential area <br />across Santa Rita Road already has been restricted in mobility by changes imposed on permitted turns. <br />The proposed activity is likely to be by appointment with patrons desiring be on time. These situations <br />invite infraction of traffic rules. Enforcement of compliance with traffic rules for gaining access to and <br />from Meadow Plaza Shopping Center pose unrealistic implications. <br />We are also concerned about the open ended size of the planned unit. The current wording of the <br />application is "four or more massage technicians provide massage services at any one time as a <br />conditionally permitted use." We suggest that a maximum number should be establisied based on the <br />size of the facility. <br />John and Ernestine Vanderveen <br />Las Positas Garden Homes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.