My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2013
>
060413
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2013 1:13:30 PM
Creation date
5/29/2013 1:10:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/4/2013
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Project would not create a significantly adverse impairment to the <br /> implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or <br /> emergency evacuation plan. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.G-18 to 4.G-19; Impact 4.G-7.) <br /> The Project would not create a significantly risk of loss, injury or death involving <br /> wildland fires. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.G-19 to 4.G-20; Impact 4.G-8.) <br /> The Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable adverse hazard or <br /> contribute to a cumulative hazardous materials impact. (Draft SEIR, p. 4.G-21; Impact 4.G-9.) <br /> 7. Hydrology and Water Quality <br /> The Project would not result in any direct or cumulatively considerable significant <br /> adverse affects to hydrological resources or water quality. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.H-16 to 4.H-24; <br /> Impacts 4.H-1 through 4.H-6.) <br /> 8. Land Use and Planning <br /> The Project would not result in any direct or cumulatively considerable significant <br /> adverse land use and planning impacts. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.1-7 to 4.1-12; Impacts 41-1 through <br /> 4.1-4.) <br /> 9. Noise <br /> The Project would not result in significant adverse impacts associated with the <br /> exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise <br /> levels associated with train pass-by events. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.J-20 to 4.J-21; Impact 4.J-4.) <br /> The Project would not have a cumulatively considerable adverse hazard or <br /> contribute to a cumulative construction noise impact at noise-sensitive receptors. (Draft SEIR, p. <br /> 4.J-29; Impact 4.J-8.) <br /> 10. Population and Housing <br /> The Project would not result in any direct or cumulatively considerable significant <br /> adverse population and housing impacts. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.K-7 to 4.K-13; Impacts 4.K-1 <br /> through 4.K-4.) <br /> 11. Public Service and Utilities <br /> The Project would not create significant adverse impacts associated with the <br /> provision of fire or police protection services or to schools. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.L-11 to 4.L-13; <br /> Impact 4.L-1.) <br /> The Project would not result in significant adverse impacts associated with the <br /> construction of wastewater treatment facilities or exceedance of wastewater treatment capacity. <br /> (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.L-16 to 4.L-17; Impact 4.L-3.) <br /> The Project would not result in significant adverse solid waste impacts. (Draft <br /> SEIR, pp. 41-18 to 4.L-19; Impact 4.L-4.) <br /> The project would not result in any cumulatively considerable adverse impact <br /> associated with an increased demand for utilities services. (Draft SEIR, p. 4.L-19; Impact 4.L-5.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.